logo
   Web Issue 3271 October 13 2008   
spacer
Brown rejects plea for Afghan pullout
MICHAEL SETTLEJuly 03 2008

Gordon Brown yesterday urged some coalition partners to make a "bigger contribution" to frontline fighting in Afghanistan as he made clear he would not set an artificial timetable for British troop withdrawal.

The Prime Minister faced a call from Jeremy Corbyn, the left-wing Labour MP, to rethink strategy with a view to the withdrawal of British troops "as soon as possible".

At Commons Question Time, the London MP said more than 2000 Afghans had died this year alone and the war would cost British taxpayers £1.6bn.

"Don't you think there's a need for a re-examination of our strategy?" he asked Mr Brown. "We've been there seven years. The poppy crop is at record levels. Wouldn't it be better to start buying the poppy crop so it could be used for medicinal purposes and not for the drug trade, to undermine the basis of the instability there and set a timetable for political dialogue that ensures we can withdraw British troops as soon as possible?"

The PM replied by insisting the responsibility for the violence and death in Afghanistan lay with the Taliban and their supporters. He explained that 58,000 soldiers with the Afghan army had been trained and the police were now training 80,000 Afghans.

'All countries should make the fullest possible contribution'

"As their capability improves we will not only allow Afghan forces to take more control over their own country but local and national government will be more secure and the economic and social development programmes we are engaged in will happen too.

"We have doubled the number of poppy-free provinces in the last period of time. We are continuing to fight the war against heroin as well."

Bob Russell, the Liberal Democrat MP for Colchester, pointed out how 43 nations were involved in the coalition but that the number in southern Afghanistan could be "counted on the fingers of one hand".

The back bencher asked: "Isn't it time our European allies did more to send their troops to the front line and not rely on Britain to take the brunt?" The PM said he agreed that every country, which had signed up to the coalition forces should make a contribution, stressing: "In some cases, a bigger contribution than they are making at the moment."

He told MPs how the French had agreed to put extra forces in Afghanistan and these would allow the American marines to move south to Helmand province while the Germans were offering support with policing, which would help increase dramatically the number of police being trained.

"But I agree," added Mr Brown, "all countries who have signed up to this venture should make the fullest possible contribution."

In Vienna, US General John Craddock, Nato's Supreme Allied Commander of Europe, said more helicopters, surveillance aircraft and unmanned aerial vehicles were needed in Afghanistan to support the armed forces there. He also made clear he wanted national governments to reduce or drop restrictions on how and where troops from their countries could be used in the alliance's Afghanistan mission.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: willie mac, Arden on 11:54pm Wed 2 Jul 08
I thought we were only putting more troops in because we were winning.

Well that's what the government said last week.

Suspect it's just like tGordon Brown's announcement that troops were being withdrawn from Iraq.

Another Government success story.

No wonder the Army want to conscript unemployed youngsters.
Posted by: britfree, camelon on 12:11am Thu 3 Jul 08
i think he reckons himself a bit of a cnut , the tides lap the throne , with apologies to the historical canute
Posted by: nostress, grangemouth on 12:15am Thu 3 Jul 08
nouveauxscum yer a genius - here's the link to the missing nicol stephen story and comments

tinyurl.com/4hxpxk
Posted by: Los Angeles, Edinburgh on 12:21am Thu 3 Jul 08

Yes, that how to win wars.

Announce you are pulling out the troops in a step-by-step draw down of numbers, lull the enemy and the wives and family of soldiers in to a false sense of security, but actually boost numbers surreptitiously. Works every time.

it is called, we need to make war to defeat war.




Posted by: Donald Anderson, glasgow on 7:06am Thu 3 Jul 08
Imperialism vs Socialism/ Give 'em Devolution from Westmonster.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use