logo
   Web Issue 3239 August 29 2008   
spacer
Recovery at heart of new drugs strategy
DAVID LEASKMay 30 2008

The Scottish Government yesterday put recovery at the heart of its first drugs strategy since devolution.

Fergus Ewing, the community safety minister, unveiled a new drive to get addicts clean and pledged extra funding for treatment programmes.

His strategy was widely welcomed by drugs experts and campaigners, several of whom said it ended the "stale" arguments over whether services should focus on programmes of abstinence or methadone, the heroin substitute.

Mr Ewing told the Scottish Parliament his "guiding principle" would be that addicts can get better, and that the government should help them. He said: "In the past there has not been enough focus on achieving positive outcomes for people with drug problems.

"We must make this a priority for the future.

"For two decades Scotland has been in the grip of drugs - reacting and responding to the impact they have had on our people, our public services, and our economic potential.

"Too many souls are lost on a road to perdition. This strategy is about taking control of our lives again - as individuals and as a nation. A hard road. A long road. A road to recovery."

Later he added: "We are good at getting people into treatment. We are not so good at getting people off treatment, off methadone."

Scotland, according to figures from 2005, has around 52,000 problem drug users and around 22,000 people who rely on methadone to manage their addiction.

Mr Ewing and his government had been under pressure, not least from the Tories, to find more ways of helping heroin users make the step from methadone to full recovery.

MSPs will debate the strategy next week. Yesterday, however, it was welcomed by Annabel Goldie, the Conservatives' leader in Holyrood.

"After eight years at long last we have the signs of a new political will in Scotland," Ms Goldie said. "For far too long, harm reduction and methadone dependency has been the norm, but I hope that the statement marks a new beginning where abstinence and recovery are at the heart of the new strategy."

Labour were not quite so supportive - at least of Mr Ewing's announcement of £94m in funding for services over the next three years. That is not as much as promised in their manifesto, said Pauline McNeill, the party's Justice spokeswoman.

"They promised a 20% increase in funding and they can't explain why they have again come up short" she said. "Most worryingly there is no target of the number of people they want to get off drugs. The lack of a tangible target appears to indicate a complete lack of faith in the strategy from the start."

Mr Ewing acknowledged the input into the strategy of the old Scottish Executive, which included Ms McNeill's Labour and the Liberal Democrats. He pledged a fresh approach on drugs education, promising to send factsheets to every parent and grandparent in the country and vowed to step up efforts to seize cash from drug dealers and organised criminals to pay for social programmes. Focusing on recovery does not mean forgetting about education or law enforcement. "Prevention isn't just better than cure," Mr Ewing said. "It's cheaper."

Mr Ewing also stressed the damage drugs are doing to the children of addicts. One in 20 children are thought to have at least one parent who is addicted. Far from all have access to social work or other support services. Mr Ewing said addicted parents could have a "serious and damaging effect" on children and added: "It is crucial that we tackle the complex problems that are faced by children living in these households."

Drugs workers yesterday welcomed the strategy - as long as it was actually implemented, rather than allowed to gather dust.

David Liddell, director of the Scottish Drugs Forum, said the move recognised that medical help or jail terms on their own were not enough to help people overcome their drugs problems.

"This is a highly ambitious plan of action which will demand a variety of agencies to change the way they work.

"It is vital that they also have the energy, commitment and appropriate resources to see it through."

Harsh statistics ...

  • Almost one-in-50 adult Scots are problem drug users. The number of addicts was estimated at 52,000 in 2005, down from 56,000 three years before.

  • Around one-in-20 Scottish children are brought up with at least one parent addicted to drugs. Research published in 2000 put the total number of children with one addict parent at between 40,000 and 60,000.

  • One-in-three adult Scots have taken cannabis at some point in their lives with one in 10 trying the substance in the last year.

  • One-in-25 adult Scots told researchers in 2006 that they had tried using cocaine in the last year.

  • One-quarter of 15-year-olds have used drugs in the last year, although there is evidence that teenage drug use is falling.

  • There were 421 drug-related deaths in Scotland in 2006, more than ever before.

  • Illegal drug use costs the Scottish economy £2.6bn a year.

  • Authorities in England and Wales have calculated the average annual cost of every single problem drug user as £50,000 a year, twice the average national annual income. Figures for Scotland are expected to be similar.

  • It cost an average of £238 a week to feed a heroin habit in 2007.

  • Two-thirds of people who seek help for drug addiction are out of work.

  • Between one-third and a half of all acquisitive crime is related to illegal drug use, according to some estimates


  • © All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.



    Posted by: Samoyed, Costa del Menie on 1:47am Fri 30 May 08
    Nobody can win the war on drugs. The only real solution is to make the war disappear legalizing and regulating consumption. It will save money, efforts, time and pains.

    Why don't we do it? Maybe because there are too many parties interested in justifying themselves and their organizations by keeping the war alive.
    Posted by: Alkie, NYC on 2:32am Fri 30 May 08
    Legalizing?

    Yeah look at how that solved the alcohol and tobacco drug problems.

    You legalize it, you unintentionally spread its usage and abuse.
    Posted by: Alkie, NYC on 3:41am Fri 30 May 08
    Alcohol is by far the most dangerous and destructive drug in Scotland, and little is being done to outlaw it. It needs to be taken off the shelfs, out of the houses, out of restaurants. Enough is enough. How long will the people of Scotland stand for the tens of thousands who die and the tens of billions that are wasted every year because of alcohol?

    The idiots who push for drugs to be legalized or even regulated need to closely look at how alcohol and tobacco have been abused through their legal production and sales.

    They say the solution is legalize something and all the bad problems associated with that thing go away. But look at what legalized alcohol has done to society.

    It kills tens of thousands costs tens of billions in damage done to society in Scotland alone each year. Yes, EACH YEAR ALCOHOL KILLS MORE SCOTS AND CAUSES MORE MONETARY DAMAGE TO THE SCOTTISH ECONOMY THAN ALL ILLEGAL DRUGS COMBINED. Only a fool would say legalization of alcohol has been a good thing.

    When something is legal, more people are likely to use and abuse it. Alcohol causes more damage than any other drug, partly because it is legal and socially acceptable.

    Things need to change. People need to start looking at alcohol like it's crack or meth. It causes more damage overall, so who can argue it? Legalization is not the answer. Prohibition is.
    Posted by: Mark fae Partick, Glasgow on 11:06am Fri 30 May 08
    Prohibition, Alkie? You working for the Mob? Obesity? Ban food?

    The drug is not the criminal, it's eccessive (mis)use by the individual that's the problem.

    Have you thought of seeking help with your "comments problem"? Try keeping a diary instead (the methadone of the compulsive gobshite), or go whole hog and quit entirely.

    You have my support.
    Posted by: Alkie, NYC on 3:10pm Fri 30 May 08
    Alcohol consumption during American Prohibition fell to 30% of the alcohol consumption before it.

    The support of national prohibition rests upon four fundamental considerations.

    First. The belief that in dealing with gigantic social evils like disease or crime, individual liberty must be controlled in the interest of the public welfare. Second. The belief that the liquor traffic is beyond question such an evil. Third. The conviction that no plan less thoroughgoing than prohibition is sufficient to eradicate the evils of the liquor traffic. Fourth. The evidence of history that other methods of attempting to control the traffic have failed and that prohibition, despite inadequacies of enforcement, will succeed better than any other program.

    Limitation upon individual freedom in matters affecting society is the price that any people must pay for the progress of its civilization. Personal liberty can not rightly be claimed for practices which militate against the welfare of others or the interests of the community as a whole.

    It is especially contrary to democratic ideals and to enlightened public policy to permit any citizen to make profit from a business which is detrimental to his neighbor. This is readily recognized by all as sound policy in regard to the trade in narcotics. It is equally true of the liquor traffic. To insure social protection against a trade whose avowed purpose was to get people to consume the maximum possible amount of alcoholic liquor is the foundation on which our national policy of prohibition rests.

    The reasons which are leading to prohibition not only remain to-day but have been reinforced by the experience of other nations. The social peril of alcoholism is becoming a growing concern to statesmen throughout the world. If serious evils will spring up when prohibition begins, they are far less than the evils which arose from the liquor traffic.
    Add your comment
    Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
    Email:
    Password:
    spacer
     IN YOUR AREA
     
    Herald Appointments - Every Friday
    Travel Shop
    Airport Parking
    Travel Insurance
    Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
    Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use