logo
   Web Issue 3279 October 15 2008   
spacer
Half of care homes for children fail to meet standards
BRIAN DONNELLYMay 29 2008

More than half of Scotland's residential care homes for children must make improvements in vital areas such as child protection and physical restraint training, a new study has found.

The Care Commission's report released yesterday found 52% of the 224 homes fell short in at least one of three critical areas.

The key areas for concern were protection from abuse from staff, fellow residents or the wider community; restraint; and care planning, aimed at tailoring care for individuals rather than a blanket approach.

The report also found there is no accurate national picture of restraint usage, with staff using outdated methods in some cases, and that children and young people feel unable to complain freely about their treatment.

The study revealed that in 60% of secure accommodation services, improvements were needed in at least one of the protection, care planning or restraint areas.

The report follows revelations of past practices at Kerelaw, near Stevenston, Ayrshire, shut down in 2006 after a police and council investigation. Two teachers were convicted of sexual and physical abuse and 12 other members of staff were sacked and others suspended.

The commission was also forced to take legal enforcement action on two residential special schools because of concerns about the safety and wellbeing of young people there.

They were Geilsland School in Beith, also Ayrshire, where it suspended admissions, and Moorehouse in Bathgate, West Lothian. Both have since met the commission's requirements.

The watchdog examined all 187 care homes for children and young people, all 32 residential special schools and the country's five secure accommodation services, involving around 2400 young people.

The report added that the Scottish Government, the councils' body Cosla, professional organisations, and the commission should work towards a standardised system for recording when physical restraint is used.

The commission received 25 complaints in just one year from young people or their representatives. It is thought there would have been more if there were better channels of complaint. "We remain concerned about whether or not young people feel able to complain about the service they live in," said the report.

Last night, Scotland's Commissioner for Children, Kathleen Marshall, said her advisers have highlighted the difficulties caused by lack of consistency in care standards.

Anne Houston, of Children 1st, said: "We also need to ask whether more can be done to keep vulnerable children and young people who cannot remain with their parents within their wider family instead of being taken into care in the first place."

Jonathan Sher, of Children in Scotland, said it is the government's role "to ensure the residential care settings have what they need to succeed and are monitored closely."

Bernadette Docherty, of the Association of Directors of Social Work, said: "It is imperative all care providers are training their staff in properly accepted methods of physical restraint."

A Scottish Government spokesman said it has commissioned experts to examine improvements and given councils £2.5m to help children in care over 2007-08.

Ronnie Hill, director of children's services at the commission, said: "We owe it to our children to do everything we can to ensure they grow up in a safe environment and emerge as responsible and achieving members of society."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.



Posted by: spagan, heisker, scotland on 10:43pm Wed 28 May 08
Care Commission
Another New Lab/Lib Quango.
Get rid of it.
Give the "inspection" duties to the Councils.
Invest any surplus in making care for children better - rather than spending money checking it out AND TELLING YOU IT NEEDS MORE MONEY!
Slainte Mhor
Posted by: frank mcbride, lusitania on 12:33am Thu 29 May 08
Although I have suggested that readers should evacuate the Herald site, I feel obliged to comment on this article.

Proper care of "damaged children" will never be successful in large group situations. Nor will it be well served by PC attitudes.

We could try small (no more than 4 ) "family" units with firm, caring family values. Children are our future, and should be appreciated as such.

In large units,scant concern is given to individual growth because most time is given over to control (of situations). This is dentrimental to both children and staff, and can, and does, lead to abuse, by both children and staff.

The cost of "mini" care would, IMHO, be no more than "maxi" care, and produce better results.

Our children, and the people who would genuinely wish to care for them, deserve better than they have at this time.
Posted by: McSomeone, Scotland on 8:05am Thu 29 May 08
Alkie. Shut up, you don't know what you're talking about, as usual.

Half of care homes for children fail to meet standards


Nothing new in this, as it always comes down to the very same thing, MONEY. Lack of proper finance for homes not only effects the properties but also the quality of the staff. they may well have good intentions but often lack the necessary qualifications and training and are understaffed. Frank suggests a good idea but it's unlikely to be implementad as that would cost a lot more money. Unfortunately these muppets in charge always go for the quick, easy and cheap option.

It was the same in Charles Dickens day and it's still the same today
Posted by: Rab Jones, Glasgow on 9:29am Thu 29 May 08
Although I have suggested that readers should evacuate the Herald site, I feel obliged to comment on this article.

Frank, people will make their own decisions whether they want to make a comment on here o not.

And why are you fed up of The Herald anyway?

Explain please.
Posted by: Alkie, NYC on 9:30am Thu 29 May 08
Alcohol is responsible for 80% of broken homes.

Get rid of the root if you want to get rid of the problem.
Posted by: Allan, glasgow on 9:31am Thu 29 May 08
Here we have the crap rag the Herald once again blocking comments on political issues- Council Tax- Democracy, this paper should be in China- It sits perfectly with the dictatorship.

RAG RAG RAG
Posted by: frank mcbride, lusitania on 9:45am Thu 29 May 08
Rab Jones.

Why?

Censorship, that's why.

Why are we not permitted to comment on certain political articles pertainento Scotland?t
Posted by: Rab Jones, Glasgow on 10:42am Thu 29 May 08
frank mcbride wrote:
Rab Jones. Why? Censorship, that's why. Why are we not permitted to comment on certain political articles pertainento Scotland?t
Stop whining about it.

The same stories are on The Scotsman, you can posts comments on there. And a lot more people contribute to The Scotsman than they do on here, so overall, it's a better debate.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use