Nearly £7m in funding has been given to more than 60 artistic companies across Scotland in a major round of grants from the Scottish Arts Council.
However, several high-profile names were among the 43 groups that failed to gain two-year funding deals from the SAC, including theatre companies such as Suspect Culture, Theatre Workshop, Borderline and 7:84, as well as institutions including the Queens Hall and the Jazz and Blues Festival in Edinburgh and the Gallery of Modern Art in Glasgow.
Robert Rae, the artistic director of Theatre Workshop, said the funding process had been "unreasonable and unjust" and the Federation of Scottish Theatre said some theatre and dance companies were now facing possible closure.
Since 2006, the arts council has had three basic forms of funding - long-term foundation funding for major companies and institutions; one-off project funding and a two-year grant system called flexible funding, the latest round of which, for the years 2009-11, was revealed yesterday.
The SAC - due to be merged with Scottish Screen next year to form a new funding body, Creative Scotland - received more than 100 applications for its flexible funding pot, seeking a total sum worth £15m. However, it had just less than £7m to distribute and so only 63 of those applicants were successful.
Jim Tough, acting chief executive of the SAC, said much of the decision-making process had been hard but the new settlement would "allow artistic leadership to flourish and meets our original aim of responding to innovation, growth and new developments in the sector".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article