The SNP faced claims last night that its energy policy is "in meltdown" after it rejected plans for Europe's largest wind farm to be built on Lewis.
Ministers said they could not approve the proposal because of the impact on the Lewis Peatlands Special Protection Area, protected by European law. Energy Minister Jim Mather stressed it did not mean other wind farms could not proceed in the islands.
Opposition politicians accused the Scottish Government of having an energy policy which was "random in manner". "The SNP's energy policy is in meltdown," said sustainable development spokesman for Labour, Iain Gray. "They are opposed to nuclear power and incapable of agreeing strategic renewable projects to replace it."
LibDem energy spokesman, Liam McArthur, added: "Ministers cannot reject some energy forms and support others in such a random and populist manner."
The announcement delighted opponents and environmental groups. But it dismayed Western Isles Council, which saw it as key to future economic prosperity, creating 400 jobs and bringing investment.
The developer, Lewis Wind Power, said it was "bitterly disappointed" by the decision.
Bill McAllister, of the Highland Renewable Energy Group, said: "The decision is a social and economic disaster for the Western Isles, but it raises major questions about the Scottish Government's alleged commitment to renewable energy.
"The Scottish administration cannot decide to reject nuclear and opt for renewable energy instead and then reject the large-scale scheme without which the administration has no chance of reaching its own renewable energy supply targets."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article