Fears were growing yesterday that higher education in Scotland could become a two-tier system after the adoption of controversial proposals to focus widening access on a few new universities rather than the ancient institutions.
The warning came after the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) announced plans to allocate a £3m fund for widening participation to universities which traditionally recruit more students from low participation backgrounds.
Institutions to benefit include Glasgow Caledonian, Napier, Queen Margaret, Robert Gordon, Abertay, West of Scotland and the Open University.
The money is to be used to expand the work these institutions already do to encourage students with ability, but not the required Highers, to use vocational HND and HNC qualifications to develop their skills at college before "articulating" into the second year of a university degree course.
While the aims of the initiative have been welcomed, concerns were raised because institutions such as Aberdeen, Glasgow, Edinburgh and St Andrews will not receive this funding and will not be expected to expand articulation in the same way.
Professor John Field, an expert in lifelong learning from Stirling University, warned it risked creating a two-tier system: "It is a conservative approach with a tried and tested system, but the weakness is that it amounts to educational segregation."
James Alexander, president of NUS Scotland, said: "It is important to widen participation through articulation, but this has to be a short-term strategy because in the long-term we want to ensure articulation is available to all universities otherwise this will simply entrench the two-tier system in Scotland."
However, the SFC defended the proposals and stressed that articulation was just one strand of a much wider agenda to widen access to low participation groups. All universities currently run widening access programmes.
Roger McClure, chief executive of the council, said: "We are going to target funding selectively to those higher education institutions who are doing the most of this work and for whom it is a significant part of their business. That does not mean that somehow the elite universities are not expected to do anything."
The row over articulation came as the SFC announced a £555m funding settlement for the further education sector for 2008-09. The package for Scotland's 43 colleges includes teaching grants worth more than £512m.
The sector will receive a £19m increase in funding for learning and teaching compared with 2007-08.
This provides for inflation at 2.7% and represents a 4% increase.
All colleges will receive an increase in funding, though some will receive a below-inflation rise based on changes in their student population.
In addition, the SFC has announced that further education colleges will be able to provide increased bursaries to students who need help with living and study costs through a grant of £72m.
And a £3m funding package was also unveiled to fund additional places in colleges in the West Highlands, Central and the South of Scotland, where participation is lowest.
John McClelland, chairman of the SFC, said: "The council is pleased to be announcing increased funding for the college sector for 2008-09."
However, the Association of Scotland's Colleges warned the increases in funding were not sufficient to meet the current expectations of the sector.
Sue Pinder, convenor of the association's principals' forum, said: "Scotland's colleges understand that we are operating within times of tighter public sector spending, and within that context we are pleased with this year's settlement.
"There are, however, areas of concern for us; as our remit continues to expand, we are expected to address an increasing number of government priorities and to have relatively small sums of money allocated towards many of these areas does pose a challenge. We will be seeking to meet with the government as soon as possible."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article