All Scotland's police forces are to introduce mandatory drugs tests in an attempt to stamp out substance abuse.
The zero-tolerance policy, which will bring Scotland's police into line with the Army and other agencies and companies across the public and private sectors, comes as concerns grow over the number of police officers frequently using recreational drugs.
Reports put the number as high as 1000 officers, 6% of the total force, using drugs on a regular basis with at least one officer being charged with dealing. However, the umbrella body for Scotland's eight forces was unable to confirm the figures.
The Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland, which is behind the roll out of the scheme, insists the move is not a knee-jerk reaction to an increase in abuse and that any recreational drug use has been a cause for concern.
Acpos could also not commit to a timescale when the scheme would be fully implemented, describing it as "work in progress" and that talks were ongoing with the Police Federation over how the policy would work.
However, Acpos insisted it was not at the stage where every officer would be tested and said the reason behind the misuse of drugs, as well as punishing those caught, would be examined. Officers in Grampian have already undergone the testing for several years, and within the next few weeks Tayside and Strathclyde will follow suit.
The scheme is expected to see probationers tested on joining, and every two years afterwards. Further testing will be required for promotion applicants and officers going for specialist posts such as firearms. Random testing will also be used on officers suspected of using drugs. Despite claims by servicemens' groups that alcohol is the real scourge of the military, the Army has sacked almost 1800 soldiers, equivalent of three battalions of infantry, for drug abuse in the past three years.
The men were dismissed after testing positive for Class-A narcotics such as cocaine and heroin during random blood and urine samplings.
A further 251 who tested positive for narcotics classified as "recreational" were allowed to remain in service provided they took part in a rehabilitation programme on a last-chance basis.
Tayside deputy chief constable Kevin Mathieson said: "In the last year we have had police officers and members of police staff investigated for abusing drugs in their social lives. Those officers and members of support staff are no longer with the force.
"The development of the national policy will provide a framework for prevention and management of alcohol and drug-related problems. This will help create and maintain a healthy workforce and enhance public trust in police and the service we deliver."
A spokeswoman for the nation's largest force, Strathclyde, said it was not the intention to test every officer.
Three years ago, at its annual conference, the Police Federation's Strathclyde branch called for all officers to be routinely tested for drugs to deter young recruits in particular from misuse. Last night, Norrie Flowers, chairman of the Scottish Police Federation, said: "We are against officers using drugs but are also concerned welfare issues be addressed when officers are found to be using drugs."
While some firms, such as Network Rail, are required by law to test employees, others do so because of health and safety concerns. More than one in 10 workers subjected to random drugs testing last year by major construction firm Laing O'Rourke were sacked after their tests proved positive.
Scottish Power also tests its workers, using the same firm, Medscreen, as Laing O'Rourke.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article