logo
   Web Issue 3191 July 5 2008   
spacer
Disaster at opening of Heathrow Terminal 5

Three flights to Scotland were cancelled today after Heathrow's new £4.3 billion showcase terminal suffered a disastrous opening day with services scrapped, luggage delayed and long queues.

A succession of teething problems with the new Terminal 5 (T5) led to the sort of problems all too familiar at the west London airport.

The airport's operator, BAA, and airline British Airways, for whom the new terminal has been built after years in the planning, had hoped that the new facility would mean a fresh start for Heathrow.

But BA was forced to cancel 34 short-haul and domestic flights - including services to Glasgow, Edinburgh and Aberdeen - and had to admit that despite lots of rehearsals there had been a problem with "staff familiarisation with the terminal".

One problem seemed to follow another after the day had got off to a good start with the first flight arriving from Hong Kong eight minutes early at 4.42am.

First, staff had problems with the car park, then a computer problem led to some departing flights having to leave with no luggage aboard.

Downstairs in the giant building, passengers off the first Hong Kong flight all got their bags in quick time.

But soon it was clear there were major problems with baggage reclaim, with some passengers having to wait as long as two-and-a-half hours to collect their cases.

By lunch time the knock-on affect of all the problems lead BA to cancel 20 flights - a figure which later increased to 34.

In early afternoon, a huge, snaky queue of more than 100 people wound back from the cancellation flights desk as people lined up to try to get away on other flights or get refunds.

To add to the difficulties the luggage belt in one part of the departure lounge failed and passengers were moved further down to a workable area.

Some of those arriving early at the airport were quick to praise the magnificence of the new building which had been officially opened two weeks ago by the Queen.

When I came here I was very excited about the new terminal, but not now
Sir George Martin

But even from early morning, some passengers were moaning. They said that the road signs were not clear outside the terminal and that they were given wrong directions once inside.

British Airways said that teething problems had included "car parking provision, delays in staff security screening and staff familiarisation with the terminal".

The airline added: "We have also had some baggage performance issues."

Record production impresario Sir George Martin, famous for his work with The Beatles, was among those caught up in the difficulties. He and his wife, Lady Martin, had arrived around two hours before their flight to Zurich only to find it was over-booked.

Sir George said: "When I came here I was very excited about the new terminal, but not now."

The couple were eventually helped by a BA staff member who was able to finally get them away on their flight after all.

Some passengers were downright angry. Kate Adamson, 39, travelling from Frankfurt with her daughter Olivia, five, walked out of the baggage reclaim without her luggage after failing to reconnect with her bags after 90 minutes.

Mrs Adamson, who was visiting her parents in Maidenhead, Berkshire, said: "I am furious. Staff have been really surly. I've given up. They can send my bags on to me."

Passengers stuck in the baggage reclaim area complained that there were no announcements or that they were merely told there was a "technical problem".

Insurance broker Michael Barnfield, travelling in from Miami with his son Charles, was among those who had a two-hour wait for luggage. Visibly angry, he said: "First we spent ages on the tarmac and then we walked through a filthy corridor before getting a coach to the terminal.

"Then we had 40 minutes to get through immigration followed by an hour waiting for our bags. I know there are teething problems, but gee."

In the long queue for those who had missed or cancelled flights were retired university lecturer Walter Henry, 66, from Holloway, north London, and his wife Helen.

Mr Henry said he'd arrived in good time for a flight to Basle only to be "given six different directions from six different people to the departure lounge".

Having missed their flight the couple were hoping to get away later today.

The first flight had as its commander Captain Lynn Barton, 51, who was BA's first ever woman pilot.

Passengers on the first Hong Kong flight received special mementoes of the day as did those on the first departing flight from T5, which pushed off the stand on time at 6.20am bound for Paris.

The first passenger to arrive at the terminal - for that Paris flight - was Paul Walker, 31, a Nairobi-based Briton.

He was greeted at the terminal by BA chief executive Willie Walsh who had also seen in the Nairobi opening flight. Mr Walker said he had been "thoroughly impressed" with T5.

The first person off the initial Hong Kong flight was Clare Hammond, 44, from Greenwich, south London, who described it as a "momentous occasion" adding that BA had "really made every effort".

BA tonight stressed the 34 cancellations was out of 380 flights taking off and landing at T5 on its opening day.

The airline also felt that it was important to bear in mind that there had been a huge operation overnight moving much of BA's Heathrow operation into the new terminal.

The big disappointment for the airline, and for BAA, will be the baggage problems today, especially as both companies had trumpeted the sophisticated nature of the new baggage set-up at T5 which is capable of handling - if all goes well - 12,000 bags an hour.

BA also stressed that no amount of rehearsals and dummy runs can really replicate a working day with real passengers, real planes and real luggage.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Tired of excuses, Galashiels on 6:38pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Makes you proud to be british doesnt it ?

And it wasnt even anywhere near capacity, 34 cancellations, 2 hour waits, and oh look no fingerprints.

Utter farce , just another straw on the back of the union donkey.
Posted by: Graham, Larbert on 6:53pm Thu 27 Mar 08
When you ask the Queen to open somthing, is it not supposed to be ready ! ....Aye, for sure if this continues, as it will do, (but the media will no tell us about it ) there will be no need for a third runway.
Is this why there are so many ( pay on entry ) VIP lounges to cope with the delays.
Use the Brain and use Schipol I say, if you can !
Posted by: Wullie, Aberdeen on 6:58pm Thu 27 Mar 08
A bigger heathrow terminal for more uncontrolled unregulated immigrants with TB to come into the country. Yeah great stuff.
Posted by: sam, greenock on 7:01pm Thu 27 Mar 08
British Airways have been rubbish for years, they're the most arrogant bunch of tossers I've ever had the misfortune to fly with.
At least RyanAir are cheap so at least you're not paying through the nose to get treated like sh!te
Posted by: Cynicus, Scotland on 7:01pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Use the Brain and use Schipol I say, if you can !
-Graham, Larbert on 6:53pm today

And if you can't, try Copenagen or Frankfurt. The rule is ABH: Anywhere but Heathrow. It is a disaster that worsens with each decade.
Posted by: porker, stirling on 7:32pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Aye cancel everything going to SCOTLAND AS USUAL.This so-called British airline dosen`t have one intercontinental flight out of Scotland,passengers going to the States travel all the way down to Heathrow to fly all the way back again on route.Wheres the carbon footprint there. BA like so many other British institutions don`t give a hoot for this country.
Posted by: Graham, Glasgow on 7:39pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Millenium Dome, Milleniumm Towers Glasgow and Plymouth. London Eye. Millenium Bridge London. Scottish Parliament Building. Glasgow Squinty Bridge. Maybe this Embryo Research could resurrect Thomas Telford.
Posted by: Graham, Glasgow on 7:44pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Porker,7:32pm. It would mean having two half empty flights to the States you Porker.
Posted by: David Alexander on 7:46pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I thought a disaster was when a plane crashed?

Schipol is sheit - lost my bag yesterday and not for the first time.
You spend more time taxiing than flying and immigration control is a palaver.

Copenhagen is good though and very aesthetically pleasing.
Posted by: JBlackley, Florida on 7:48pm Thu 27 Mar 08
A score for British innovation and knowhow!

Why on earth does the British government continue to back expansion of what really is a city airport? They built Gatwick as an alternative but left a road link into London that's utterly incapable of handling the traffic load. They built Stansted as an alternative to Gatwick and I won't begin to enumerate the failings in transport between there and the city. Then they touted Luton - Luton! - as an alternative to the alternatives!

Listen. When the city airport becomes too small and unfit for purpose, the viable alternative is to built a new airport on a brownfield site AND build effective traffic links from there to where all the people want to go - i.e. into the city.

Goodness, people are building international airports on muck dumped in the sea nowadays. Can't the British do better than building another pretendy terminal building cheek-to-jowl with all the other pretendy, overcrowded, failing predecessors?
Posted by: jonny bond, glasgow on 8:13pm Thu 27 Mar 08
the headline grabbers are taking liberties. My point what is the story you expect from disaster....terminal 5 a few late flights or A terrorist attack leading to casualties. We really are leading a cloistered existance if we beleive a disaster is a few late flights. What about a few downed flights with all aboard presumed dead thats a disaster. So is that in any way comparable I don't think so.
Posted by: Graham, Larbert on 8:13pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Is there any truth in the rumour that the biggest que at T5 was for the freephone to the SAMARITANS !
Fly the flag ? eh !..........he he he .
Posted by: jonny bond, glasgow on 8:14pm Thu 27 Mar 08
how about dreadful delays rather than disaster.
Posted by: OHO, Glasgow on 8:16pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Graham, Glasgow
Does it not make sense to have people from LONDON and other parts of the UK flying to Glasgow/Edinburgh/Pr
estwick for a flight to the USA to minimise the double journeys? Or do you assume as BA seems to, that London is the centre of the Universe?
For me, its ABL - anywhere but London for flights.
Posted by: Lachlan, Stirling on 8:59pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Amazing to think that it took 6 years to construct and cost £5.2 billion and yet earlier this evening 34 flights were cancelled or re-routed, and only ONE out of 22 lifts and escalators were working! Staff could not even get to work for passengers directed to the wrong car parks outside T5! The software for the miles of baggage carousel is in meltdown and BA and BAA are at each others throats in the ensuing embarrassment!
Posted by: Smellie, Smellieville on 9:23pm Thu 27 Mar 08
If you call teething troubles a disaster, what are you going to headline a disaster when / if it happens?

"By lunch time the knock-on affect of all the problems lead BA to cancel 20 flights"

Now that sentence is what I call a disaster .. can't blame BA or BAA for that one, Harold.
Posted by: pencildick on 10:27pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Its Alex Salmonds fault.
Posted by: Graham, Larbert on 10:30pm Thu 27 Mar 08
While a few of you sit at the end of a mouse and debate the meaning of the "Disaster" phrase, may I sugest you ask any person "delayed"
at T5. If they've missed a business meeting, birthday, job interview, holiday connection etc, I dont think they will appreciate "teething trouble".
The language at Heathrow T5 HQ will be a wee bit more colourful, me thinks !
Posted by: martin, edinburgh on 10:35pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Send Smeato down! He would sort it!

or at least take the credit for it when it was
Posted by: Jwil, Lanarkshire on 10:40pm Thu 27 Mar 08
More lost luggage, never to be seen again unless you can find the auction!
Posted by: Anne, overhere on 10:55pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I love flying, but airports, new terminals, I loathe them; next time I'll catch the train.
Posted by: Scamp on 10:58pm Thu 27 Mar 08
I refuse to fly to London now.... I've got totally peed off with wasting an entire day for the sake of a meeting that lasts a couple of hours at most...
Posted by: Alex Porter, Madrid on 10:59pm Thu 27 Mar 08
"Disaster" - What a dreadful misuse of language.
Posted by: Scotsgait, www.scotsgait.co.uk on 11:10pm Thu 27 Mar 08
Let's get this into perspective. It was a severe inconvenience; it was not a "disaster"



_____________
Should we allow the creation of hybrid human-animal embryos for research purposes ? Cast your vote at Scotsgait. an independent internet community for Scotland

Posted by: Shirley Hodge, Glasgow on 1:37pm Fri 28 Mar 08
While I do feel a bit of pity for the unsuspecting passengers I got a great and good laugh at seeing all the big guys at Heathrow and the government having to eat their words. The teething anology was particularly funny especially if the new terminal is anything like the old terminals teething will last through potty training and well into puberty.
Posted by: Ross, Toronto on 5:05am Sat 29 Mar 08
That nasty Alex Salmond stole all the Scottish engineers back to Scotland to re-engineer Wendy Alexander.
Quel domage! Sarkosy must have **** himself laughing!
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use