Alex Salmond's plans for a referendum on independence met a fierce barrage of criticism from his opponents yesterday.
Unionist MSPs rubbished the First Minister's proposal for a ballot paper in which voters would have to list their preferences.
It was made as he put pressure on those opposition parties to produce a clear plan to put to voters in a referendum that he wants in 2010. If they refuse, he warned he will make this a dominant theme of the following year's election campaign.
He also launched the second phase of his National Conversation on Scotland's constitutional future, appealing to an audience of civic leaders to take part.
If the newly formed Scottish Parliament Commission produces a clear plan for enhanced powers for Holyrood while staying within the UK, he said he expects three choices on the ballot form; independence, devolution with more powers or no change.
The Single Transferable Vote (STV) system, which was used for council elections last year, could mean the Scottish Government being given a mandate to negotiate independence on the basis of second choices, once the votes behind the least popular option are redistributed.
Tory leader Annabel Goldie said: "You do not decide the destiny of a country on the basis of the second best or least-worst option. This is tripe - the wild words of a panicking man."
Labour leader Wendy Alexander said: "Alex Salmond must be delusional if he thinks that Scotland will be happy to accept independence by the back door."
A spokesman for Mr Salmond said: "I don't think there is a more front-door option for the people of Scotland to choose their constitutional future than in a democratic referendum."
Liberal Democrat leader Nicol Stephen accused the SNP of trying to drag an unwilling Scotland to independence. "No matter how hard they push and prod, Scotland remains firmly determined to reject separation," he said. "This latest U-turn is a red herring, designed to deflect attention from the ever-decreasing levels of support for independence."
Mr Salmond lacks a majority of MSPs which he would need to secure support for an independence referendum. The invitation to add a devolution-plus option is intended to draw in support from opposition parties, and to avoid them jointly taking their eventual plan for more powers to a vote of the Scottish Parliament, providing a mandate for amending the Scotland Act at Westminster.
"Our preference is a straight choice for independence," Mr Salmond said. "But another way to do it if you've got another choice is 1, 2, 3. People are handling the idea of STV very well, so why shouldn't it be used? The idea that Scotland is not capable of engaging in a debate, crystallising choices and then making a decision, is nonsense."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article