John McCain, the Republican candidate for the 44th US Presidency, yesterday warned that al Qaeda was "on the run but not defeated" in Iraq as he praised the long service and sacrifice of British troops in the region.
His stopover in London coincided with 60 anti-war campaigners marking the fifth anniversary of the Iraq invasion with a minute's silence outside the gates of Downing Street and the delivery of a letter to Gordon Brown, demanding a public inquiry into the conflict.
After his talks with the Prime Minister, the 71-year-old senator and Vietnam veteran carefully avoided being drawn into the hot domestic issue of how long UK soldiers would remain in Basra. "I believe that decision is a matter for the British Government and people," he told reporters.
However, the incoming Republican candidate for the presidency made clear his commitment to the US mission and warned that any premature withdrawal would risk handing victory to the terrorists. "The fact is," he declared, "al Qaida is on the run. They are not defeated. We're going to have to continue training the Iraqi military and do what we have been doing if we are going to achieve a stable situation in Iraq."
Mr McCain, who is on a week-long tour of Europe and the Middle East as a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, expressed appreciation for the "long-standing and unique relationship" between Britain and America based on "common values and common efforts". He praised the "long service and sacrifice" of British troops in both Iraq and Afghanistan while acknowledging the public's anxiety at the slow pace of progress.
"I fully appreciate that British public opinion has been frustrated by sometimes our lack of progress in both areas. All I can do is express my gratitude to the British Government and people, especially the brave young people who are serving."
Mr McCain spent 45 minutes talking to Gordon Brown on issues ranging from Iraq and Afghanistan to climate change and reforming international institutions. The Prime Minister's spokesman described the discussions as "constructive". Later, the American politician went to the Commons to have a meeting with David Cameron and some of his Shadow Cabinet. The Conservative leader said the discussions were "fascinating and very productive".
On UK troop numbers, No 10 said that as and when there was an update the Ministry of Defence would make it - a regular turnover of soldiers was due later this spring - but the PM's spokesman stressed that any decision on them would be made on the basis of military advice and the conditions on the ground.
David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, acknowledged British troop numbers in southern Iraq were on a "downward trajectory". Last year, the Prime Minister announced the British force, currently numbering around 4100, would be cut to 2500 "from the spring" of this year, with the possibility of further cuts to follow.
Mr Miliband refused to comment on reports that that target would not be met but insisted troop numbers were on the way down. Earlier, he claimed the war was "a remarkable victory" but acknowledged the peace had been "much more difficult than people expected".
With Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the two Democrat hopefuls in the race to the White House, committed to withdrawing US troops, Mr McCain acknowledged Iraq would be "a very big issue in this campaign as to whether we withdraw and have al Qaeda win and announce to the world that they have won".
The Republican politician claimed the American public was beginning to see last year's troop surge in Iraq as a success. He insisted it was possible to build "a stable, functioning - not very effectively, but functioning - democracy" in Iraq, noting: "I believe if we had done what others were advocating, it would have had disastrous consequences for the United States, chaos and further sacrifice on the part of the American people."
The Arizona senator backed Mr Brown's decision to meet the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan leader, saying: "I am very disturbed about what is happening in Tibet.
"I strongly urge them (the Chinese) to respect the rights of the people who are demonstrating there."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article