Councillors are to seek an urgent meeting with Scottish Natural Heritage in a last-ditch attempt to save the giant Lewis wind farm.
They want to see if the agency will change its approach to European environmental directives, despite earlier recommending refusal of the application because it said developers had not shown there would be no adverse effects on the integrity of Special Protection Areas.
A special meeting of Comhairle nan Eilean Siar (Western Isles Council) was held in Stornoway yesterday in the wake of the news the Scottish Government is minded to refuse permission for Europe's largest wind farm The council is convinced that the £500m project could transform the fortunes of the islands. But ministers have told the developers: "We have concluded that the proposal would have significant adverse impact on a site protected by the Wildlife and Habitats Directives."
Developer Lewis Wind Power has until the end of next week to dissuade ministers from refusing it, and is being helped in its efforts by councillors.
Yesterday it agreed to seek an urgent meeting with SNH chairman Andrew Thin. A spokesman for the council said: "There was concern about SNH's attitude to environmental directives and designations, and how it seems inconsistent with other parts of the country and other parts of Europe.
"It was seen by councillors as meaning effectively no development at all, particularly in the Western Isles, whereas other areas seem to approach the directives and designations as being measures brought in to allow development to go ahead in sensitive areas subject to important mitigation.
Development official Derek McKim said: "It is clear that it is up to the member states to interpret the EU directives. Other states take a different, more liberal, view."
He said there was a view in other countries that "climate change should take precedence over environmental considerations".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article