Play video
Environmental campaigners staged a demonstration outside the offices of a leading UK biofuel supplier yesterday.
Protesters dismissed the use of biofuels as an alternative to fossil fuels and warned of "climate disaster" if their use caused deforestation.
Gathered outside the Edinburgh office of Greenergy, an oil company and biofuel supplier, campaigners waved banners and banged drums as police officers looked on.
Their demonstration is part of a national week of action.
Biofuels are any kind of fuel made from living things, or from the waste they produce, and come from organic materials ranging from sugar beet to wheat.
They have been hailed as a renewable alternative to fossil fuels in transport.
But campaigners argue that the push to use crops for fuel can expose areas of environmental importance, such as rainforests, to the risk of deforestation.
They say that some biofuels produce more carbon than fossil fuels.
Ben Miller, 21, a politics student at Edinburgh University and member of the group People and Planet, handed a letter to a member of Greenergy staff outlining the protesters' objections to growing crops for fuel.
"The biofuel industry is actually leading us down the path towards a climate disaster," he said. "Biofuels are not green and consumers need to realise that this is not a green fix to our transport problem."
He accepted that there was a role for small-scale, locally-produced fuels, made from waste crops.
"We are going to have to make some tough decisions about what we can use our land for with such a burgeoning population."
Greenergy greeted the protesters with cups of tea.
Alex Lewis, head of communications, said that they shared some of the protesters' worries.
"It is a perfectly valid debate and it is important that everybody gets this right," she said.
"We do agree that biofuels need to be sourced from sustainable sources."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article