Secondary schools across Scotland were yesterday criticised for not showing enough urgency in tackling the country's healthy eating crisis.
A new report by schools inspectors found that, while primaries were progressing well with meeting government targets, progress in secondaries is slower.
HM Inspectorate of Education (HMIE) acknowledged that this was partly because of the influence of adolescent culture, commercial pressures and greater freedom of pupils to go beyond the school grounds at lunchtime. But Graham Donaldson, HM senior chief inspector, warned that poor progress in secondary schools "in part relates to a lack of priority and urgency".
The report, Further Food for Thought, which assesses the Scottish Government's Hungry for Success initiative to improve school meals - launched in 2002 by the former executive - suggested that widening the ban on some types of food in schools may be necessary. But inspectors concluded that even if Hungry for Success worked well, the policy alone would not address the obesity problem - Scots youngsters are some of the most unfit in the world.
More than a third of 12-year-olds are overweight, nearly 20% are obese and 11% severely obese.
"While work in schools can make a significant contribution to improving the diets of children, eating patterns outwith school need to change," the report says.
Professor Mike Lean, head of human nutrition at Glasgow University, said tackling the issue required a Scotland-wide policy of keeping pupils inside the school gates at lunchtime.
But Bill McGregor, general secretary of the Headteachers' Association of Scotland, said that if teachers, parents and pupils of a secondary could all agree on such a policy it could be successful, however that was "unlikely".
"Schools have worked very hard to develop and promote healthy menus," he said.
Adam Ingram, the Children's Minister, said the government was working to promote healthy eating through a National Food Policy, to be launched today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article