Widespread racism was exposed inside Britain's immigration removal centres last night in an official report.
The Borders and Immigration Agency (BIA) said its detainees had been called "black bastards", "donkeys" and "animals" and described the atmosphere as "distressing and turbulent" at one centre and "tense" at another.
The agency, part of the Home Office, is responsible for holding thousands of failed asylum seekers and other offenders and criminals being thrown out of the UK but contracts out the management of its removal centres to a variety of private and state bodies.
It launched its official audit of racism - published yesterday - after a TV documentary broadcast in 2005 uncovered racist abuse at the Oakington removal centre in Cambridgeshire.
However, BIA praised Scotland's only centre, Dungavel in Strathaven, South Lanarkshire, for its work with minorities, despite some evidence of racism.
The agency found the worst racism at Harmondsworth, a large centre near Heathrow frequently used to house former Scottish residents on their way out of the country.
"Regular taunting of detainees by some officers goes unchallenged," the BIA report found. Repeated patterns of alleged racist incidents were missed by the in-house investigation process, it added.
There were even "staff on staff" problems at Harmondsworth, where an auditor overheard a senior officer tell an Asian colleague: "Talk proper, I can't understand you."
Rating each of the 10 centres with a series of performance scores, last night's report, carried out by an independent team from Focus Consultancy, ranked Harmondsworth - run by private company Kalyx - as the worst, with a percentage score of 35%. The two best centres, in Dover (77%) and Haslar, Hampshire (81%), were run by the state. Dungavel was among the best with 69%.
"The centre has a very tranquil feel and most of the detainees seemed comfortable in their surroundings," the report said of the controversial Lanarkshire facility. "The approach by staff was very low-key, and, whether by accident or design, it was a style very suitable to the Dungavel environment."
The centre did not, however, escape criticism. It won plaudits for its "cultural kitchen", where detainees can share dishes from their home countries, but auditors discovered some residents felt they were denied access to the kitchen "as a result of bias or the racist attitude of staff".
The Herald last year revealed insider concerns about the number of ex-convicts awaiting deportation from Dungavel, which also houses the families of failed asylum seekers.
Ex-cons are filling many of the UK's other nine removal centres. At one, Colnbrook, which, like Harmondsworth, is near Heathrow, they told auditors they would rather be in jail than in immigration detention.
It was at Colnbrook that investigators heard a member of staff refer to detainees as "black bastards" and shout: "Animals, lock-up time."
BIA chief executive Lin Homer said: "The BIA takes any allegation of abuse or misconduct very seriously which is why we commissioned this report.
"We are pleased the report recognises race relations procedures are operating above average at nine out of 10 centres. Our aim, however, is further improvement and to that end we will consider the recommendations closely."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article