IAN GRANT and DAVID ROSS
The mysterious death of a young Scot almost 11 years ago could be the subject of a new police investigation.
The prospect emerged yesterday at a meeting between Northern Constabulary's Chief Constable Ian Latimer and members of Kevin McLeod's family.
Mr Latimer apologised for the shortcomings of his force in the initial inquiry and in its response to the family's subsequent welter of complaints.
He also agreed to consider the family's request that an outside force review the circumstances surrounding the 24-year-old's unsolved death in his home town of Wick in February 1997.
After his body was recovered from the town's harbour, a post-mortem examination revealed severe damage to some of his internal organs.
His parents, Hugh and June McLeod, and uncle Allan McLeod are convinced he was brutally beaten shortly before he ended up in the water.
Police investigations failed to find evidence of foul play and a fatal accident inquiry recorded an open verdict.
Yesterday's meeting in Wick Assembly Rooms was convened after a recent report by Scottish Police Complaints Commissioner Jim Martin.
Mr Martin accused Northern Constabulary of "institutional arrogance" in its dealings with the family and called on Mr Latimer to tender an overdue apology.
MP John Thurso, who chaired yesterday's two-hour private meeting, said: "Mr Latimer apologised unreservedly to the McLeod family in the manner recommended by Mr Martin.
"It's an apology which the family have accepted in full."
Mr Latimer had told the family he would contact the Crown Office early in the new year to discuss the family's request for a new inquiry.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article