Wendy Alexander yesterday insisted she would be cleared over an illegal donation to her Labour leadership campaign as speculation grew that the MSP who solicited the cash could be forced to quit.
Charlie Gordon, the Glasgow Cathcart MSP, said he would make a statement on his political future later this week.
Mr Gordon has resigned as Labour transport spokesman, but his position was further undermined yesterday when Paul Green, the Jersey-based tycoon who made the £950 donation, said it was "a mystery" why he had told Ms Alexander's campaign team the money had come from a Glasgow property firm.
Labour MSPs held their first group meeting yesterday since Mr Green's identity was revealed by The Herald and gave their embattled leader their support.
Speaking before the meeting, Ms Alexander said that, while mistakes had been made, she would not resign as leader because no intentional wrongdoing had been committed.
The Labour leader also said correspondence, believed to be between her and Mr Gordon in which she enquired about the permissibility of Mr Green's donation, would clear her name.
"I have no doubt that when the Electoral Commission looks at all the facts, I will be exonerated of any intentional wrongdoing," she said.
The SNP has accused Labour of using Ms Alexander as "a human shield" to protect Prime Minister Gordon Brown, whose own position is under scrutiny over illegal donations to Labour.
Ms Alexander said: "I have had one conversation with the Prime Minister and it was absolutely not the case that the Prime Minister said please, please, stay."
It also emerged Charlie Gordon had accepted money, again breaking electoral laws banning foreign donations, from Mr Green in the run-up to May's Holyrood elections.
Yesterday, Mr Gordon said: "I am not going to go into any detail of the two matters because of due process with the commission."
Speaking from Jersey yesterday, Mr Green said Labour was guilty of "gross mismanagement".
"The cheque was a personal cheque, it was accompanied by a personal letter from me, sent from my home address in Jersey and typed by one of my secretaries here in Jersey," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article