The judge in the Nat Fraser trial made a mistake which made it harder for the Crown to seal a conviction, the appeal court heard yesterday.
The Crown argues that even if there was a misdirection to the jury there was no miscarriage of justice in the outcome of the case.
John Beckett QC, for the Crown, said Lord Mackay of Drumadoon had misdirected jurors by telling them they could only find Fraser guilty if they believed he had put his wife Arlene's rings back in her house after she went missing.
"This introduced an extra hurdle that the Crown had to overcome in order to prove its case," said Mr Beckett.
"In my submission, that direction can only be seen as favourable to the appellant."
But he added: "I would not accept that even if we have a misdirection we have a miscarriage of justice". The Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh is hearing the eighth day in Fraser's appeal against his murder conviction.
His defence claims he suffered a miscarriage of justice because the advocate-depute in the trial made the rings the "cornerstone" of his case.
Evidence has since emerged that two police officers may have seen the rings in her house the night she disappeared, which neither the Crown or defence knew at the time.
The appeal continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article