Government efforts to cut the number of anti-depressants prescribed by GPs were thrown into doubt yesterday after new figures showed they had increased four-fold over the past decade.
A report by NHS Quality Improvement Scotland (QIS) found that the number of prescribed daily doses of the drugs had gone up from 19 per thousand to 85 between 1992 and 2006.
Medical experts at QIS, a health board established to oversee improvements in the NHS, said the record level of prescriptions may be due to the popularity of newer anti-depressants such as Prozac, which had fewer side effects, and patients being given more drugs over a longer period. But it was not clear whether there had been any increase in the number of people diagnosed as depressed.
Mental health charities expressed alarm at the latest figures, saying they showed an overdependence on medication to treat mental illnesses and highlighted a lack of available alternative treatments such as psychological therapy.
Faced with a rise in prescriptions, the previous Scottish Executive imposed a target of reducing the increase in anti-depressants being prescribed to zero by 2009. But while there were some signs that prescription rates were levelling out, there was scepticism over the SNP's manifesto commitment to cut them by 10% over the same period.
Dr Dorothy Muir, chair of the QIS clinical outcomes group, said that, though there were signs prescription rates were levelling, it was "probably unlikely" they could be reduced.
Dr Geraldine Bienkowski, lead clinician for psychology at NHS Education for Scotland, said there was "limited" evidence that providing alternative therapies led to a cut in prescription rates. But there was also evidence that, in some situations, increasing the provision of psychological therapies had a knock-on effect of increasing the rate of prescriptions, as it increased awareness of depression among GPs, she said.
Prescription rates for anti-depressants are strongly linked to deprivation, with Greater Glasgow having the highest rate in the country, according to QIS's figures.
Women are more likely to be diagnosed with depression and the condition was most common in the 25 to 44 age group, its figures show.
However, research undertaken by Glasgow University has found wide variations in prescribing levels between GP surgeries and that factors such as deprivation, gender, and age only account for 50% of these.
Dr Philip Wilson, a Glasgow GP involved in the research, said that different prescribing cultures within GPs surgeries may account for some of the variation. He also questioned whether simply cutting levels of prescriptions was in patients' best interests.
"There's a lot of evidence that people's depression relapses if they stop them too soon. In the case of a second or subsequent episode of depression the guidelines are now telling us we should be prescribing for a period of two years," he said.
Shona Neil, chief executive of the Scottish Association for Mental Health, said the figures betrayed a medical culture in which there was a "pill for every ill". She said: "People are being prescribed these pills for problems which are far beyond mental health issues. If you're living in poverty, are unemployed and without a good social support network, a pill isn't going to improve any of that. We have pathologised suffering to a level that isn't helpful."
Dr David Steel, chief executive of NHS QIS, defended the use of a target but conceded it was unlikely the new goal could be met. He said: "One of the great advantages of a target like that is it gets us talking about it, even if we don't meet it."
Shona Robison, Health Minister, said the Scottish Government was committed to the previous administration's goal of "levelling off" the prescription of anti-depressants and had invested £4.5m in developing alternative treatments for people with depression.
But she made no mention of the SNP's previous manifesto commitment. "We are striving to drive down the prescribing of antidepressants by offering a range of other effective interventions," she said.
Last night a Scottish Government spokeswoman denied that the manifesto commitment had been dropped saying it was "still committed to the reduction over the next two years".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article