Details of a sensitive family court case which could have led to a seven-year-old discovering who her real father was were posted on the internet yesterday under instructions from a senior judge.
Lord Osborne said there were no grounds for granting anonymity and ordered that details including the girl's name and the identity of her biological father be published, despite an earlier ruling that she should be protected from it.
He later ordered that details of the Court of Session hearing on the Scottish Courts website be replaced by an edited version.
The case centred around a man seeking regular contact with his seven-year-old daughter, who is unaware he is her biological father and believes her mother's new partner is her real father. But his appeal was thrown out by the Court of Session in Edinburgh yesterday after first a sheriff and then a sheriff principal had refused him contact with the girl.
The court heard the man and the girl's mother had a relationship in 1999 and she later found she was pregnant Afterwards he went abroad but visited the mother and baby once a week after her birth. He then sought DNA tests.
He later returned abroad and there was no contact between the parents until 2001. He then requested to see the girl and the mother agreed. He spent hours with her and then told the mother he would see his daughter again in a year. A further meeting took place in 2002 but the child has not seen him since.
Her mother married another man whom the girl now believes to be her father. She does not know of the existence of her real father.
A spokeswoman for the Scottish Courts Service said that the unedited version of the court case was removed from its website after an approach was made to Lord Osborne requesting that the details were made anonymous.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article