British troops in southern Afghanistan came under Taliban fire 1279 times in the 11 months to the end of August - an average of four attacks a day - The Herald has learned.
The level of violence exceeded that of any conflict since the Korean War in the early 1950s and is in marked contrast to the average 15 major incidents a month - three a week - logged against UK forces during 38 years of counter-insurgency in Northern Ireland.
A total of 34 soldiers died in Helmand and Kandahar provinces during the period for which figures are available, with eight further deaths since then. Overall, 82 British service personnel have been killed there since 2001.
A further 245 have been wounded in action since last year, including 68 with life-threatening injuries.
The Royal Anglians, who returned to the UK last week after six months as a spearhead battalion in Helmand, suffered nine dead and 114 wounded and fired almost 400,000 bullets during their tour of duty.
Most of the Taliban firepower was aimed at fewer than 1500 men acting as the forward battlegroup contingents in Sangin, Kajaki and Gereshk. More than 500 incidents took place during the winter "ceasefire" months when Afghans traditionally abandon military activity because of the weather.
British soldiers have fired an estimated two million rounds of rifle and machine-gun ammunition and killed more than 1000 of their opponents since 2006.
A Parachute Regiment source said: "The Taliban are not well-trained and they tend to do things that get them killed. But they're undoubtedly courageous and they have a natural instinct for using the ground to their advantage."
Brigadier Andrew Mackay, one of Scotland's most experienced infantry officers, yesterday took command of the Helmand task force along with the 50-strong staff of the Edinburgh-based 52nd Infantry Brigade In Afghanistan yesterday, gunmen armed with machine-guns opened fire on people praying at a mosque in Wardak province, killing two and wounding 12 others.
And a German engineer and four Afghans taken hostage in July were freed yesterday in exchange for five imprisoned criminals.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article