Scotland's biggest police force was last night rapped for holding a 14-year-old boy in adult cells for more than two days.
Police Complaints Commissioner Jim Martin, in his first major announcement, last night called on Strathclyde Police to apologise to the youth and his mother after an incident he said pointed to a "systemic failure" in the way the force detained children.
The boy - identified as X - was locked up for 59 hours last year in two separate police stations after he was found carrying a knife and drunk at 2.30 on a Saturday morning in September 2006.
His mother, who was not immediately told of his detention, made 16 complaints against the police, seven of which Mr Martin upheld after a painstaking four-month investigation.
Mr Martin said: "It is of significant concern that, in considering the overall complaint, Strathclyde Police failed to identify and take steps to correct what appears to be a systemic failure in relation to the detention in custody of children.
"It is clear to me that various Strathclyde Police officers of various levels of seniority, were operating with an incorrect understanding of the force's standard operating procedures relating to the detention in custody of children."
Mr Martin, a former senior teaching union official, last night made it clear that he will be a robust and independent arbiter for police complaints.
He called on the Chief Inspector of Constabularies to look at his concerns with Strathclyde's conduct over the child's detention. The Herald understands child X may not be the only individual under 16 detained in breach of Strathclyde's own rules.
Senior officers at Strathclyde were late yesterday still digesting Mr Martin's findings and unable to comment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article