Guilty: first Scots Islamic terrorist facing 15 years
A young Muslim was last night facing up to 15 years in jail after his conviction as Scotland's first home-grown Islamic terrorist.
Mohammed Siddique, 21, from Alva, Clackmannanshire, was found guilty at the High Court in Glasgow of being a "wannabe suicide bomber" who provided training material useful to terrorists via websites he set up and ran. He had accessed password-protected websites used only by the most senior of players in al Qaeda's online operation.
Security sources claimed yesterday the former computing student was also involved in plans to detonate a truck bomb in a shopping mall in Canada and had been held at Glasgow Airport to prevent him from linking up with a Canadian terror cell.
However, police attempted to forestall any backlash against Scotland's Muslims, insisting Siddique's conviction was for individual criminal acts and did not reflect on the wider community.
Assistant chief constable Maureen Brown of Central Scotland Police, who was in charge of Operation Niche, which led to Siddique's arrest 18 months ago, said the case showed terrorism was no longer a threat Scotland could ignore.
She said: "This case and other recent events have shown that terrorism is not just an issue for the major cities in England. The threat is with us now, it's real and we should all take responsibility for helping to tackle it."
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said: "The successful conviction of the individual today in Glasgow is a reminder that the threat we face from terrorism is real and not isolated to any particular region."
The court heard Siddique had distributed training documents, including bomb-making and weapons assembly, and al Qaeda propaganda video messages recorded by Osama bin Laden, urging attacks against British and US targets. They were described during his four-week trial as a "call to arms for Muslims".
Siddique had denied three charges under the Terrorism Act 2000 and one under the Terrorism Act 2006, claiming his hoard of jihadist material was collected for "research". He was also found guilty of a breach of the peace for threatening to become a suicide bomber and showing fellow students at Glasgow Metropolitan College video clips showing people being beheaded.
Judge Lord Carloway said the court would take the offences "extremely seriously" and warned Siddique that he was considering an extended term when sentencing takes place on October 23 at the High Court in Edinburgh.
Siddique sat motionless and looked straight ahead as the guilty verdicts were returned. His family wept in the court.
Outside, Siddique's solicitor, Aamer Anwar, said the verdict was a "tragedy for justice and freedom of speech" and that they were considering an appeal. He said: "Today Mohammed Atif Siddique was found guilty of doing what millions of young people do every day: looking for answers on the internet."
Siddique was arrested at Glasgow Airport in April 2006. He had been under surveillance for several months. He was about to board a flight to Lahore in Pakistan. His tickets and laptop computer were seized.
The case did not include charges of belonging to a terrorist organisation or allegations that he was directly involved in a terrorist plot. However, security sources said yesterday he was stopped because of intelligence that he planned to travel via Pakistan to Canada and carry out a terrorist atrocity in Ontario.
The plan was discovered by police monitoring online exchanges with a terrorist suspect from England who cannot be named for legal reasons but is thought to have been a major recruiter of Islamic extremists in the UK.
© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without
permission is prohibited.
Posted by: John, Livingston on 3:59pm Tue 18 Sep 07
It wsa becoming pretty obvious that this guy had no chance of a fair trial. The establishment is determined to find scapegoats.
As always the real culprits, Blair and his cronies, including Brown who wholeheartedly supported the slaughter in Iraq, get off scot free.
It wsa becoming pretty obvious that this guy had no chance of a fair trial. The establishment is determined to find scapegoats.
As always the real culprits, Blair and his cronies, including Brown who wholeheartedly supported the slaughter in Iraq, get off scot free.
Posted by: Kenilworth on 4:42pm Tue 18 Sep 07
John - that is a pretty ridiculous comment to make - almost as incredible as the utterances of Aamer Anwar yesterday - who is prone to propound views which are unsupported by the facts.
Why did Siddique have no chance of a fair trial? What was he a scapegoat for.
Siddique was found guilty after a trial before a jury. He was treated far better than some Moslems treat what the Koran describes as apostates if last night's DIspatches programme is anything to go by.
John - that is a pretty ridiculous comment to make - almost as incredible as the utterances of Aamer Anwar yesterday - who is prone to propound views which are unsupported by the facts.
Why did Siddique have no chance of a fair trial? What was he a scapegoat for.
Siddique was found guilty after a trial before a jury. He was treated far better than some Moslems treat what the Koran describes as apostates if last night's DIspatches programme is anything to go by.
Posted by: Finbar 71, Nottingham,UK on 6:17pm Tue 18 Sep 07
John,Livingston-what a lot of dangerous tosh you spout.This budding terrorist has had more than a fair trial and at whose expense???Anwar's comments are no surprise,however that does not lessen my disgust at them.The day this nation looks to someone like Anwar to defend justice and freedom of speech would be a sad,sad day.His comments are an outragous slur on all witnesses and everyone else involved in this trial.Why can't he be held to account for an attepmt to incite trouble with his unfounded allegations??Does he know something that noone else does???Looking for answers on the internet.It would appear the littlewans you used to pop down The Subbie as a student pal have caused serious delusional problems.A breaker of the law defending a terrorist.Dangerous clowns.The pair of them.
John,Livingston-what a lot of dangerous tosh you spout.This budding terrorist has had more than a fair trial and at whose expense???Anwar's comments are no surprise,however that does not lessen my disgust at them.The day this nation looks to someone like Anwar to defend justice and freedom of speech would be a sad,sad day.His comments are an outragous slur on all witnesses and everyone else involved in this trial.Why can't he be held to account for an attepmt to incite trouble with his unfounded allegations??Does he know something that noone else does???Looking for answers on the internet.It would appear the littlewans you used to pop down The Subbie as a student pal have caused serious delusional problems.A breaker of the law defending a terrorist.Dangerous clowns.The pair of them.
Posted by: Malcolms, Glasghoul on 7:15pm Tue 18 Sep 07
Finbar ,Anwar Khan raised legit points on the verdict: Explain to us how downloading material from a website makes him a terrorist? Explain to us how his voiced opinion makes him a terrorist? In the trial at no time did the Crown produce evidence showing he was about to commence a terrorist attack. What the Crown produced was very flimsy evidence "suggesting" that he "might" become a suicide bomber. This is not good enough. Secondly if a researcher goes on to a Jihadist website to study the material will they be prosecuted for downloading and passing that material for his/her own agenda. This dodgy verdict is more about the British establishment not being able to engage or debate young muslims, So they just lock then up. This verdict is very close to some of the dodgy decisons taken in Northern Ireland in the 70's.
Finbar ,Anwar Khan raised legit points on the verdict: Explain to us how downloading material from a website makes him a terrorist? Explain to us how his voiced opinion makes him a terrorist? In the trial at no time did the Crown produce evidence showing he was about to commence a terrorist attack. What the Crown produced was very flimsy evidence "suggesting" that he "might" become a suicide bomber. This is not good enough. Secondly if a researcher goes on to a Jihadist website to study the material will they be prosecuted for downloading and passing that material for his/her own agenda. This dodgy verdict is more about the British establishment not being able to engage or debate young muslims, So they just lock then up. This verdict is very close to some of the dodgy decisons taken in Northern Ireland in the 70's.
Posted by: George Laird, Glasgow on 7:23pm Tue 18 Sep 07
Dear All
I am not an Aamer Anwar fan because I knew him in passing from University of Glasgow.
But Anwar has a point, Mohammed Siddique is certainly guilty of being an a$$ but not a terrorist.
If he wants to download from the internet material that is freely available then that is not terrorism.
He was convicted because he is a muslim and because of colour.
Let us not forget that in evidence, it was stated he had a beard!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Dear All
I am not an Aamer Anwar fan because I knew him in passing from University of Glasgow.
But Anwar has a point, Mohammed Siddique is certainly guilty of being an a$$ but not a terrorist.
If he wants to download from the internet material that is freely available then that is not terrorism.
He was convicted because he is a muslim and because of colour.
Let us not forget that in evidence, it was stated he had a beard!
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Posted by: Rab, East Kilbride on 11:20pm Tue 18 Sep 07
As we learnt from the Glw Airport attack these people live among us. What are we supposed to do...wait until they succeed with their evil deeds before we step in.
He accessed password protected websites, distributed training documents, including bomb-making and weapons assembly, and al Qaeda propaganda video messages urging attacks against his fellow British citizens including muslims, threatened to become a suicide bomber and showed fellow students video clips showing people being beheaded.
He did the crime, got caught, now he must do the time.
I feel sorry for his family, but not for him.
As we learnt from the Glw Airport attack these people live among us. What are we supposed to do...wait until they succeed with their evil deeds before we step in.
He accessed password protected websites, distributed training documents, including bomb-making and weapons assembly, and al Qaeda propaganda video messages urging attacks against his fellow British citizens including muslims, threatened to become a suicide bomber and showed fellow students video clips showing people being beheaded.
He did the crime, got caught, now he must do the time.
I feel sorry for his family, but not for him.
Posted by: Mark Boyle, Johnstone on 12:09am Wed 19 Sep 07
[quote][bold]George Laird[/bold] wrote:
Dear All I am not an Aamer Anwar fan because I knew him in passing from University of Glasgow. But Anwar has a point, Mohammed Siddique is certainly guilty of being an a$$ but not a terrorist. If he wants to download from the internet material that is freely available then that is not terrorism. He was convicted because he is a muslim and because of colour. Let us not forget that in evidence, it was stated he had a beard! Yours sincerely George Laird The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University[/quote] Aye, and I also knew Aamer Anwar from his University of Glasgow days. I know very well the sort of person he is and his agenda (when in charge of the evil thugs of the Socialist Workers Party at Glasgow Uni, he was arrested umpteen times & gain a conviction for an unprovoked assault & vandalism at the Queen Margaret Union).
Check his post-University track record & you find someone parachuting into every potential [bold]racial[/bold] flashpoint in Scotland and far from merely pouring oil on troubled waters does his best to chuck a lighted match on top.
There are some people on this planet that are beyond the pale, and are NEVER to be given "he has a point" moot no matter what, and Anwar is right up there with the Nick Griffin's - opposite sides of the same cursed coins. And the sooner the naive idiots in the Scottish media realise this & vilify him (& his chum Osama Saeed) for the latter day Matthew Hopkins he is, the better.
As for Mohammed Siddique, shed no tears for a wannabe toerag that got caught before he got the chance to commit mischief. Would we feel so sorry had he been a "groupie" instead for the IRA , Adam Busby's SNLA or even the ALF? He's got plenty of time now to realise what a clown he's been, and all the other Toytown revolutionaries that think being a "freedom fighter" is "cool". Spare your tears for his family and friends having to live down someone that betrayed their love.
George Laird wrote:
Dear All I am not an Aamer Anwar fan because I knew him in passing from University of Glasgow. But Anwar has a point, Mohammed Siddique is certainly guilty of being an a$$ but not a terrorist. If he wants to download from the internet material that is freely available then that is not terrorism. He was convicted because he is a muslim and because of colour. Let us not forget that in evidence, it was stated he had a beard! Yours sincerely George Laird The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Aye, and I also knew Aamer Anwar from his University of Glasgow days. I know very well the sort of person he is and his agenda (when in charge of the evil thugs of the Socialist Workers Party at Glasgow Uni, he was arrested umpteen times & gain a conviction for an unprovoked assault & vandalism at the Queen Margaret Union).
Check his post-University track record & you find someone parachuting into every potential
racial flashpoint in Scotland and far from merely pouring oil on troubled waters does his best to chuck a lighted match on top.
There are some people on this planet that are beyond the pale, and are NEVER to be given "he has a point" moot no matter what, and Anwar is right up there with the Nick Griffin's - opposite sides of the same cursed coins. And the sooner the naive idiots in the Scottish media realise this & vilify him (& his chum Osama Saeed) for the latter day Matthew Hopkins he is, the better.
As for Mohammed Siddique, shed no tears for a wannabe toerag that got caught before he got the chance to commit mischief. Would we feel so sorry had he been a "groupie" instead for the IRA , Adam Busby's SNLA or even the ALF? He's got plenty of time now to realise what a clown he's been, and all the other Toytown revolutionaries that think being a "freedom fighter" is "cool". Spare your tears for his family and friends having to live down someone that betrayed their love.
Posted by: Stuart, Dubai on 5:16am Wed 19 Sep 07
Well said, Mark!
Posted by: KARA, GLASGOW on 12:00pm Wed 19 Sep 07
Ditto Mark!
Posted by: Kenilworth on 6:05pm Wed 19 Sep 07
Malcolms, Glasghoul and George Laird - the simple fact is that Siddique contravened the law of the land pure and simple. It is nothing to do with innocent activity or being a moslem.
Anwar has had an unfortunate habit of attaching himself to outrageous causes over the years. I believe we would cringe still further if he was honest enough to expose the links he has with organisations who seek to undermine our wellbeing and, perhaps, our very existence. But I'm not holding my breath - disingenuity is his watchword.
Malcolms, Glasghoul and George Laird - the simple fact is that Siddique contravened the law of the land pure and simple. It is nothing to do with innocent activity or being a moslem.
Anwar has had an unfortunate habit of attaching himself to outrageous causes over the years. I believe we would cringe still further if he was honest enough to expose the links he has with organisations who seek to undermine our wellbeing and, perhaps, our very existence. But I'm not holding my breath - disingenuity is his watchword.
Posted by: George Laird, Glasgow on 6:33pm Wed 19 Sep 07
Dear Mr. Boyle
“Aye, and I also knew Aamer Anwar from his University of Glasgow days”.
I always thought he wanted to be popular fighting for a cause. Although he shouted his mouth off all the time, he did take part in the campaign for anonymous marking to be introduced at the University of Glasgow.
At that time there was a considerable stink because asian dental students were allegedly being marked down considerably more than their white counterparts.
I remember this well because Rob James (English dental student) took the part of the Professor accused. So it could be argued did some good on that occasion, Aamer not Rob.
“I know very well the sort of person he is and his agenda (when in charge of the evil thugs of the Socialist Workers Party at Glasgow Uni”.
Yes, I found them to be pains myself when working at Queen Margaret Union doing security, they thought they had more rights than others.
“he was arrested umpteen times & gain a conviction for an unprovoked assault & vandalism at the Queen Margaret Union”.
Perhaps you could expand on that for me.
I remember recently walking along with a lecturer pal of mine and seeing Aamer and his wife in the street. I asked my mate, why is he dressed like a prima donna? He looked like an effeminate tart to me, money has certainly turned his head.
I also like the story about him and his mother’s disability badge in the Sunday Mail, parking is so costly round Carlton Place.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University
Dear Mr. Boyle
“Aye, and I also knew Aamer Anwar from his University of Glasgow days”.
I always thought he wanted to be popular fighting for a cause. Although he shouted his mouth off all the time, he did take part in the campaign for anonymous marking to be introduced at the University of Glasgow.
At that time there was a considerable stink because asian dental students were allegedly being marked down considerably more than their white counterparts.
I remember this well because Rob James (English dental student) took the part of the Professor accused. So it could be argued did some good on that occasion, Aamer not Rob.
“I know very well the sort of person he is and his agenda (when in charge of the evil thugs of the Socialist Workers Party at Glasgow Uni”.
Yes, I found them to be pains myself when working at Queen Margaret Union doing security, they thought they had more rights than others.
“he was arrested umpteen times & gain a conviction for an unprovoked assault & vandalism at the Queen Margaret Union”.
Perhaps you could expand on that for me.
I remember recently walking along with a lecturer pal of mine and seeing Aamer and his wife in the street. I asked my mate, why is he dressed like a prima donna? He looked like an effeminate tart to me, money has certainly turned his head.
I also like the story about him and his mother’s disability badge in the Sunday Mail, parking is so costly round Carlton Place.
Yours sincerely
George Laird
The Campaign for Human Rights at Glasgow University