Scotland spends one-fifth less on law and order than England, a new study claimed yesterday.
It found the Scottish Government parts with £213 for every man, woman and child on policing a year, well short of an English average of £255.
The study by Arthur Midwinter, a commentator on government finance, also found police spending had risen steadily under the old Labour-Liberal Democrat administration at Holyrood, but not by enough to keep up with the English.
His work was commissioned by the Scottish Police Federation. General secretary Joe Grant said: "We've had concerns about police funding in Scotland for some time. We now have the evidence to show that since devolution we have been very poorly treated and we want the new Scottish Government to give us priority in this spending review."
"It is well known that every major public service in Scotland spends significantly higher amounts than its counterparts in England. This reflects higher social needs and higher unit costs. The police have never reached parity far less enjoyed the benefits from this arrangement. If we had been fairly treated we would have been able to deliver a much higher-quality police service in Scotland."
The previous administration in Scotland ahead of the last elections far outspent its English counterparts in health, housing and education. The Lab-Lib coalition simply chose to focus more on those areas than on law and order.
Professor Midwinter said: "The research reveals that police expenditure per capita in Scotland is significantly lower than in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Overall, police expenditure in the UK is 21% higher than in Scotland. This has arisen as a direct result of executive decisions on political priorities, rather than anything done by Whitehall or local government."
The Scottish Government has pledged to put another 1000 police officers on the streets. But it, too, is now facing a cash crunch as the next strategic spending review, due this year, appears to be less generous than in recent years.
A source close to the government said: "This is part of the legacy left to the new SNP government by the previous Labour-Liberal administration. They talked big on law and order, but delivered small."
An official spokeswoman was more diplomatic: "The people of Scotland," she said, "want to see more police on the streets. The Scottish Government is committed to delivering just that.
"We currently spend £1.1bn per year on policing. All future spending plans will be announced as part of the Strategic Spending Review 2007 which is due to be announced later this year.
"We cannot pre-empt the outcome of the SR07, however, we can continue to look at ways of giving our police more time and powers to tackle crime on the streets with schemes like the fixed-penalty notices which, from today, are available to officers in all of Scotland's force areas."
Bill Aitken, Tory Glasgow MSP, said the last administration had treated the police as a "Cinderella service". He was also sceptical about the Scottish Government's on-the-spot fines. "People could commit a multitude of crimes and merely get on-the-spot fines, without any proper criminal record," he said. "Crime and offences are on the increase, police stations are going part-time and now we have pay-as-you-go criminals."
Mr Aitken, is convener of the Scottish Parliament's Justice Committee, which yesterday announced it would make a detailed study of whether police chiefs could better use their officers.
The all-party committee is expected to report next year whether there are traditional police functions that could be carried out by other bodies.
A spokesman for the Association of Chief Police Officers in Scotland said: "We will look at this report and consider its contents.
"Acpos continues to engage with the Scottish Government to ensure all relevant information is made available to shape future spending plans."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article