Countryside workers convicted of wildlife crime could lose their firearms licences and landowners could face financial sanctions under plans unveiled by the Scottish Environment Minister yesterday.
Michael Russell said the measures would act as a deterrent because it would restrict employment opportunities for those guilty of such offences.
He also said financial penalties including stripping landowners of state subsidies if crime takes place on their property would prompt farmers and estate owners to introduce greater safeguards.
The minister suggested the plans following a recent spate of wildlife crime, including poisonings of birds of prey.
Mr Russell said the removal of firearms licences was one of several possibilities.
He said: "People who work in the countryside very often need those (firearms) for work. Anybody found guilty of this, I believe, and I want to consult on this, should automatically lose their firearms licence. That would reduce their employment prospects substantially."
Mr Russell said cash penalties could be broadened where the crime took place on land which was subject to public payments, such as the subsidy known as the single farm payment which is worth an average of around £20,000.
"If the owners of that landholding are involved, then we should reduce or eliminate state subsidies to them."
The minister said he was "absolutely appalled" at the recent spate of attacks, including a golden eagle being poisoned last week in the Borders.
He said: "There should be no doubt the Scottish government is determined to stamp out this shameful and barbaric practice which has no place in a modern, civilised country."
Wildlife organisations said the level of crime showed further steps are needed.
Duncan Orr-Ewing of RSPB Scotland, said: "The regularity with which we see these crimes occurring proves that sentencing has not been a sufficient deterrent, and more needs to be done to tackle those engaged with serious wildlife crime.
"We'd also like to see at least one full-time serving wildlife crime officer for each police force in Scotland, and better resources given to environmental procurators-fiscal to enable them to more effectively prosecute such crimes."
But there was a mixed political response to the plans.
Labour environment spokeswoman Sarah Boyack said: "We back calls for greater use of financial penalties against landowners, however we would caution against targeting gamekeepers. Responsibility and accountability should lie with the estate and not with individual workers."
Tory rural affairs spokesman John Scott described the moves as "potentially heavy-handed", though in general terms he welcomed the principle of further tightening legislation.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article