logo
   Web Issue 3275 October 11 2008   
spacer
Clinic gives free couples’ fertility treatment to sperm donors
HELEN PUTTICK, Health CorrespondentAugust 27 2007

WOULD-BE fathers are being offered the chance to exchange sperm for fertility treatment amid a massive shortage of donors in Scotland.

Although payment for sperm donations is banned by law, a Scottish clinic is allowing couples where the man is healthy to swap semen for services he and his partner need. The controversial decision has been taken by Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine (GCRM) amid a dearth of sperm donations.

Legal changes which allow offspring to find out their donor father's name are thought to have led to the severe shortage.

However, demand remains high from couples where the man has fertility problems, as well as from lesbian partners and single women.

The directors of GCRM, based in Cardonald Business Park, say people call seeking donor sperm every week and have to be turned away. The centre, opened by NHS specialists last September, had purchased enough supplies from Manchester for 10 couples.

However, this rapidly ran out and they have had no stock since March. Now GCRM is launching an advertising campaign at Scottish train stations seeking both sperm and egg donors.

The adverts mention a service already carried out at GCRM, known as egg-sharing. This is where a woman undergoing IVF shares some of her eggs with a woman who cannot produce her own. In return, the recipient pays for most of the donor's treatment.

In addition, the adverts promote sperm-sharing for the first time. In contrast to egg-sharing, it is GCRM which will fund a couple's treatment costs in return for the semen.

Professor Richard Fleming, centre director, said: "Because one sperm donor can generally provide up to 10 treatments for other needy recipients we decided that we should bear the costs. It is called a payment in kind, which appears to be allowed under the guidelines of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority."

Gemma Wilkie, of the HFEA, confirmed the practice was permitted under their regulations. She said: "You cannot be paid. You cannot be given money, but clinics are allowed to provide a compensation in the form of a reduced-cost of treatment."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.



Posted by: LauraG, glasgow on 11:03am Mon 27 Aug 07
Couples seeking fertility treatment do so because they want to have a child with the person they love. They are in responsible loving relationships. The last thing I would want is for my husbands 'child' from sperm donation turning up on my doorstep in the future.
However, the laws for sperm donation that allow disclosure of the fathers name are completely necessary. Every child deserves to know its biological identity. While there is no reason that lesbians and single mothers cannot be caring and loving parents , sperm is something that you can 'pick' up in a supermarket - it is part of your childs identity. Its about time people realised that just because you want a child it does not necessarily mean you can have one,bilogically at least. Emotionally blackmailing desperate fathers is a low move.
Posted by: Jowo, Glasgow on 4:43pm Mon 27 Aug 07
Sounds a fair trade - gift of life from one partner in exchange for a gift of life from another.

Does LauraG think there are deserving and undeserving types for fertility treatment as she seems to indicate only straight couples that don't have fertility problems should have children?

There are plenty of couples that would welcome sperm donation from any man, gay or straight, and would be grateful for it.
Posted by: laura G, glasgow on 5:40pm Mon 27 Aug 07
jowo -as an adopted child I know what it feels like to grow up not knowing about your biological family. I have traced my mother - but my father remains unidentified. I have a fabulous adopted family -but always wonder about my biological heritage. I know many others through a support group that feel the same. i think that sperm and egg donation is creating a generation of children that will never know their heritage. As a new technology - we do not know the future questions that children conceived with donated sperm or eggs may wish to ask. It seems like the parents desire to have children is far more important than this. WE WANT A CHILD AND WE DONT CARE WHERE IT COMES FROM......Every day I look in the mirror and wonder which parent I inherited my features. People think that because you give birth to the child that it wont ever wonder where it came from - I cant help but think this is wrong. I am glad that children will now have the right to trace ,if only the name, of their donated genes. If you are brought up by two woman Its fairly obvious that the other half of you came from somewhere. I dont think gay woman/men/single woman should not have babies - I just think that using anonomous donors is wrong. Moreover that the idea that the simple solution of ' spreading the sperm' does not address the needs of the children that it conceives. I think it is selfish to go and to create a child from ingredients picked up from a clinic (GAY STRAIGHT WHATEVER). What are the consequences of donating sperm now? Now that you can rightly trace the donor - can you want to be part of your fathers lif? No wonder donor rates are down. People are finally realsing that donation is not JUST proving a sample, its creating a new life. Its not like blood donation - your not saving lives - you are gicng life to a child that is partly yours.

In the past if you couldnt have a child you just got on with your life. Or adopted a child that needed a home. I think a lot will come out in the future from children conceived in this way and it wont be pretty. Just because you want a child it is not a human right.
Posted by: eddie, maryhill on 8:06pm Mon 27 Aug 07
I agree with Laura G. If a man conceived a child through a one night stand and didnt then take any responsibility for the kid we'd all say he was running away from his responsibilities. The same goes for all this egg and sperm donation. Its all your bodily fluids so you have to be reponsible for it. I dont feels sorry for the folk that need 'sperm or egg donations' Funny now that men may get found out the arnt donating!! In the old days not having kids was just gods way - now its something to be fixed. Everyone goes on and on about single mothers and how girls shouldnt get pregenant - now we are supposed to feels sorry for woman that cant be lone parents - I dont think so. Get on with your life - you can contribute more to society than another mouth to feed. if these folk taht want eggs and sperm arent willing to share what they got they shouldnt be taking other peoples.
Posted by: jowo, Glasgow on 11:03am Tue 28 Aug 07
Comparing the outcome of a feckless knee trembler with the regulated process of fertility treatment which is a considered and planned affair (and often painful and expensive) is disingenuous and unkind.
LauraG may have anxieties about her origin but clearly there are procedures in place that make the donor aware that he can be traced so a child conceived this way will not undergo her experience.
Posted by: jowo, Glasgow on 11:07am Tue 28 Aug 07
Comparing the outcome of a feckless knee trembler with the regulated process of fertility treatment which is a considered and planned affair (and often painful and expensive) is disingenuous and unkind.
LauraG may have anxieties about her origin but clearly there are procedures in place that make the donor aware that he can be traced so a child conceived this way will not undergo her experience.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use