WOULD-BE fathers are being offered the chance to exchange sperm for fertility treatment amid a massive shortage of donors in Scotland.
Although payment for sperm donations is banned by law, a Scottish clinic is allowing couples where the man is healthy to swap semen for services he and his partner need. The controversial decision has been taken by Glasgow Centre for Reproductive Medicine (GCRM) amid a dearth of sperm donations.
Legal changes which allow offspring to find out their donor father's name are thought to have led to the severe shortage.
However, demand remains high from couples where the man has fertility problems, as well as from lesbian partners and single women.
The directors of GCRM, based in Cardonald Business Park, say people call seeking donor sperm every week and have to be turned away. The centre, opened by NHS specialists last September, had purchased enough supplies from Manchester for 10 couples.
However, this rapidly ran out and they have had no stock since March. Now GCRM is launching an advertising campaign at Scottish train stations seeking both sperm and egg donors.
The adverts mention a service already carried out at GCRM, known as egg-sharing. This is where a woman undergoing IVF shares some of her eggs with a woman who cannot produce her own. In return, the recipient pays for most of the donor's treatment.
In addition, the adverts promote sperm-sharing for the first time. In contrast to egg-sharing, it is GCRM which will fund a couple's treatment costs in return for the semen.
Professor Richard Fleming, centre director, said: "Because one sperm donor can generally provide up to 10 treatments for other needy recipients we decided that we should bear the costs. It is called a payment in kind, which appears to be allowed under the guidelines of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority."
Gemma Wilkie, of the HFEA, confirmed the practice was permitted under their regulations. She said: "You cannot be paid. You cannot be given money, but clinics are allowed to provide a compensation in the form of a reduced-cost of treatment."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article