Transport bosses yesterday warned that removing tolls on the Forth Bridge would lead to traffic disruption and cost around 40 people their jobs.
The Forth Estuary Transport Authority (Feta) also spoke of their "frustration" that the charges are being lifted so soon after a £5m project to upgrade the part of the bridge where the tollbooths are located.
The Scottish Parliament unanimously backed the executive's plans to scrap the tolls on the Forth and Tay bridges at the end of May.
Alastair Andrew, the Forth bridgemaster, has submitted a report to Feta setting out the work that will be required to meet the executive's deadline of having the tolls removed by the end of the year.
Tony Martin, the Feta convener, said: "There's naturally some frustration that we're preparing to dismantle the toll plaza so soon after upgrading it. However, I have greatly admired the professionalism and pragmatism that Feta staff have shown in responding to this change in Scottish Executive policy, particularly when so many jobs are under threat as a result."
Although executive ministers have sought to play down the level of job losses which will result from the scrapping of the tolls, Feta sources estimate that around 40 of their 100-strong workforce could go. Mr Martin also warned drivers to expect delays when the work to remove the tollbooths takes place.
John Swinney, the Cabinet Secretary for Finance and Sustainable Growth, insisted the decision would end the "injustice" suffered by those living in Fife and Tayside.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article