The timetable allotted for consultation on Britain's new test-tube baby laws is too short, Scotland's two most senior Catholics have told the Prime Minister.
Cardinal Keith O'Brien and Archbishop Mario Conti have written to Gordon Brown asking him to urgently review the timetable for the ongoing public consultation on the Human Tissue and Embryology Bill.
Highlighting the proposal to remove the current reference in legislation to a child's need for a father, they argue that elements of the draft legislation could be very harmful to the long term welfare of children. They claim the proposal in Part 3 of the proposed Bill constitutes "a sweeping attempt to rewrite traditional concepts of parenthood and the family."
"This means that prior to provision of fertility treatment, there will no longer be any requirement, nor guidance, to consider the child's need for a father," their letter states.
Cardinal O'Brien and Archbishop Conti conclude: "We believe that the state should not deny the child's need for a father nor ignore a wealth of social research findings upholding the notion that deliberately planning to have fatherless children is inimical to their long-term welfare."
The clerics point out that the joint parliamentary committee which is conducting a consultation on the Bill will be sitting for a mere two months, over the summer and during the Parliamentary Recess.
"We do not believe that there has been anywhere near sufficient widespread and informed public consultation' on the matters in question and that to proceed in haste with regard to issues of such grave importance is both improper and dangerous," they say Read more in The Herald
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article