A full range of measures - including satellite tracking and lie detectors - could be brought to bear on sex offenders who go into hiding, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill said yesterday.
He said these technical measures would be looked at, as well as already agreed methods such as posting identities and photographs of those who abscond or breach conditions.
But he rejected Labour's call for DNA samples for all crime suspects to be kept by the police. "If what you are asking is anybody who is charged with a very minor offence and has a routine sample taken from them should have their DNA retained, then I think that takes the balance too far," he said.
Conservatives approached ministers in the wake of the Angelika Kluk case; it emerged Peter Tobin, the convicted sex offender who raped and murdered the Polish student, had been on the run for almost a year before carrying out the killing.
Mr MacAskill said the problem lay with a small number of offenders, saying: "They are few but they are predatory, devious and highly dangerous."
The previous administration had already agreed pictures of those who breached the terms of the sex offenders' register could be published on the internet.
Mr MacAskill said: "Today, I reaffirm that if a sex offender goes missing and fails to comply, then the response will be tough."
He told MSPs that would include, where appropriate and subject to the guidance of the police and the Crown Office, publishing photos on the internet and elsewhere.
He added: "We will look, with our enforcement agencies, at the opportunities offered by new technology such as satellite tracking and polygraph testing."
Labour's community safety spokesman, Paul Martin, said it was vital the necessary resources were put in place for the measures proposed.
Conservative justice spokes-man Bill Aitken described his party's proposals as common sense and welcomed the support they had received from other parties. He said: "We are talking about dealing with people who have already been convicted, who have already been sentenced for this type of offence."
Mr Aitken also called for a US-style "most wanted list" to be compiled. "Because these are dangerous people, their pictures should be up on a website, their pictures should be on television."
Susan Matheson, chief executive of Sacro, the charity that works with offenders after their release into the community, said a balance must be found. She said: "There has to be a balance between danger and what might amount to harassment of offenders."
Victims of the devious and dangerous
The murder of Jessica Chapman and Holly Wells in Soham in 2002 by Ian Huntley led to greater information sharing between police and other authorities to ensure sex offenders were unable to take up jobs working with children. Calls for a "Mark's Law" - similar to Megan's Law in the United States - to be introduced in Scotland were made after Mark Cummings, pictured, was killed by known sex offender Stuart Leggate, who lived in the same tower block as the boy in Royston, Glasgow. They were eventually rejected by the Scottish Executive amid fears they could drive sex offenders underground. In one of Scotland's most notorious child murders, nine-year-old Scott Simpson was lured away from an Aberdeen playground by convicted paedophile Steven Leisk and killed in July 1997.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article