SNP ministers are coming under increasing pressure to decide whether there is a case to halt the controversial public inquiry into the Beauly to Denny power line.
News of the mounting pressure emerged yesterday as the inquiry opened its first local session in Inverness, which is expected to last five weeks and take evidence from 60 witnesses.
It will then move to Newtonmore, Perth and Stirling and will be one of the longest and most expensive inquiries in Scottish planning history before it closes in December.
Almost three months ago, in Perth, three legal submissions were made by different groups objecting to the power line which would carry all the extra energy generated by windfarms and other renewable projects in the Highlands and Islands.
The submissions were based on what campaigners claimed were major flaws in the case presented by the applicants, Scottish and Southern Energy (SSE) and ScottishPower. One flaw was that the regulator, Ofgem, had failed in its statutory duties to consider environmental impact, sustainability and alternatives to the power line before approving the £320m the companies are proposing to invest.
There was also a challenge on European environmental legislation, and another on the future development of renewable energy projects.
As a result, campaigners argued that the inquiry should recommend refusal of the application immediately and not hear any further evidence about the proposed 400,000 volt transmission line.
The inquiry reporters immediately forwarded the legal submissions to Scottish Executive ministers but there has still been no ministerial response.
John Campbell, QC, for Eilean Aigas and Lovat estates and Aigas Field centre, told Tim Brian, chairman of the three-strong inquiry reporter team, that the delay was becoming a problem.
"I respectfully suggest that it is now too long and parties are entitled to a decision either from yourselves or from Scottish ministers. It is not acceptable and frankly not responsible for this matter to have dragged on as long as it has.
"So, I would urge you to either commit to delivering a decision or give me some assurance a decision will be forthcoming from ministers in the not too distant future."
Mr Campbell accepted that the inquiry now had its own momentum and was unlikely to be halted, but a decision was still needed.
Davie Black, a wildlife campaigner for Ramblers Association Scotland, said last night that there was still a case for halting the inquiry "at the very least until these issues are resolved."
A spokesman for the executive would only say that ministers were still considering the submissions but could not say when a decision was likely.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article