A disabled woman was yesterday celebrating a £2500 compensation payout after a tattoo parlour refused her entry, saying it did not "do people like that".
Rachael Monk, 24, from Lockerbie, Dumfriesshire, was four days into a two-week family holiday in the holiday resort of Blackpool when she went for a tattoo.
Staff at the first shop visited by Ms Monk, who is a wheelchair user with cerebral palsy, said she would have to fill out a medical form and that it had a flight of stairs.
They then recommended another shop with better access.
However, Preston County Court heard that when Ms Monk went to the second premises, Jordan Dean, owner of Body Creation, told her family: "We don't do people like that."
When they tried to reason with him, he telephoned his father, claiming that he was his boss.
The father came to the shop and according to the judge, adopted an "old-fashioned and highly discriminatory attitude" and offered "gratuitous insults", which continued on to the street after the family left the building.
After the incident in September 2005, Ms Monk's family contacted the Disability Rights Commission (DRC), a quango set up to tackle discrimination, which offered conciliation between both parties - but the shop refused to co-operate.
The case was then taken to court.
At the hearing on Monday, Ms Monk was awarded £1000 for injury to feelings and £1500 for aggravated damages. Mr Dean must also pay £300 court costs. A deadline of June 19 has been set for payment.
The defendant offered no evidence for his treatment of Ms Monk.
Ruling in favour of Ms Monk, district judge Gordon Ashton told the court: "It was abundantly clear, once one took the trouble to communicate with Rachael, that she knew her own mind, was proud of the small heart (tattoo) already displayed on her right arm, and wanted that tattoo she had chosen for her left upper arm."
Judge Ashton added that Mr Dean "did not attempt to make any assessment of Rachael's vulnerability or capacity He simply ignored her and made assumptions based upon her physical abilities."
Ms Monk said yesterday: "It was all really awful for me and my family. I was not able to eat anything or enjoy the rest of my holiday. But I am feeling great today and am happy it is all over.
"I got my say in court, that was the main thing, and I was able to let the lad know my feelings about the way I was treated.
"Hopefully this judgment will stop other shops doing the same thing."
Ms Monk had a new tattoo done a few weeks later at a shop in Silloth, Cumbria, where she had her first one done.
Her mother, Elaine, 50, said yesterday: "It was a horrible experience, absolutely awful. But we are all pleased at the outcome."
Adam Gaines, Scottish director of the DRC, said: "Rachael has the right to do the same thing as other young people.
"This judgment should send out a warning to all businesses that outdated assumptions and ignorance about disabled people will not be tolerated."
The industry does not have a regulatory body in Scotland.
However, James McGonigle, one of the country's most respected tattoo artists who established Spacey's Bizarre Ink in Edinburgh 14 years ago, and whose patrons now include professional footballers and pop stars, later said: "I am stunned, absolutely stunned that any tattoo artist would turn someone away because they are disabled."
A spokesman for Blackpool Council said: "We are very unhappy to learn of this unfortunate incident.
"As a resort we work very hard to welcome everyone and it is appalling to hear of discrimination of this sort.
"The courts obviously agreed, which is why this business has been fined. Anyone who has a complaint of this nature should take it to the Disability Rights Commission."
No-one from Body Creation could be reached for comment yesterday.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article