The National Trust for Scotland confirmed yesterday that major job cuts are in the offing as part of a wide review.
Almost one in six of the conservation charity's 500 staff could go in an effort to make savings of about £3m.
The aim of the review being conducted by recently recruited chief executive Mark Adderley, a former Scottish Water director of human resources, is to ensure the trust has a more sustainable future.
But it is estimated between 60 and 80 jobs will be lost, as staff costs represent half of its spending.
Rising costs and poor visitor figures have been blamed for the financial losses incurred by the trust in recent years.
A spokesman said: "The trust has begun consultation on the reorganisation but cannot provide an exact number likely to be affected. We have indicated to staff the overall number is likely to be 60 to 80.
"With the review being at an early stage, it is not possible for us to provide any further details but we will make more information available at the earliest opportunity.
"Meanwhile, the properties across the country are open for everyone to enjoy. One of the best ways for people to help the trust to continue its conservation work is by joining as a member and visiting our gardens, houses, castles and countryside."
As Scotland's largest conservation charity, the trust protects and promotes the country's natural and cultural heritage.
It has guardianship of more than 125 sites, including mountains, battlefields and properties such as Pollok House in Glasgow, Falkland Palace in Fife and Abbotsford House, the home of Sir Walter Scott, in the Borders.
But the trust has experienced difficult times lately and figures for 2005-06 revealed an annual loss of £1.2m.
Visitor numbers also dropped by 11,000 although membership grew to nearly 300,000.
The trust's share of the visitor market for the year was put at just 3.17% with almost half of its properties receiving fewer than 10,000 visitors.
There are fears that some of the rented properties safeguarded by the charity will have to be sold off, while staff are worried about compulsory redundancies.
One of Scotland's leading conservationists sympathised with the trust's plight.
Dr Richard Dixon, director of WWF Scotland, said: "It is an organisation that has a lot of property, which costs a lot of money to look after.
In a changing world it is going to have to change and occasionally there will be painful moments when it has not managed to catch up."
Dr Susan Buckham, director of the Architectural Society of Scotland, said: "The trust plays a crucial role as guardian of Scotland's heritage and property in its care, which includes some of the finest architecture and landscapes in Scotland."
She said she would be concerned if it was not able to continue its job.
Robin Pellew, former chief executive of the National Trust, warned on his departure last year that the trust was "well behind budget" and "some very tough decisions" would have to be made.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article