logo
   Web Issue 3277 October 13 2008   
spacer
Sex offender tagged for 10 years
Exclusive by LUCY ADAMS, Chief ReporterApril 30 2007

Two sex offenders released into the community in Scotland are being forced to wear an electronic tag - one for the next 10 years - because they are considered such a risk to society.

In what is thought to be the longest tagging conditions ever placed on criminals in the UK, one man has been put on an electronic monitoring order for the next decade and the other for eight years.

The men, who cannot be named for legal reasons, were both serving sentences of more than four years before their release last year. Their risk of reoffending is deemed so high they must remain within their homes next to the electronic monitoring box for at least 12 hours overnight.

For the remaining half of the day, for at least the first six months of their release, they are receiving supervision from Sacro, a charity that works with offenders in the community.

One source close to the decision said there are concerns about tagging people for such long periods.

"There are some who think such a long-term order breaches the civil rights of the offenders but when their risk is considered so high, intensive support must be in place to ensure they do not reoffend," he said. "Others argue if someone is so high a risk they need a tag, perhaps they should not be released at all."

The parole board has had the power to include tagging on release as part of the conditions of licence since January 2004. The board was initially reticent about using the power but in the past few months The Herald has learned some 15 criminals have been tagged on the board's recommendation, two of whom have been recalled to custody for breaking conditions of the licence.

The move follows calls by Cathy Jamieson, Justice Minister, to make use of powers to tag prisoners on release amid concern about the numbers reoffending.

In 2004 she intervened in the row over the early release of prisoners by calling for the parole board to be made more accountable to politicians and victims and to use electronic monitoring.

The parole board of Scotland directs the release of prisoners serving four years or more. It makes release conditions for life sentence prisoners and those on extended sentences.

Once released, offenders on licence have their progress monitored by supervisors who can refer back to the parole board to have conditions changed.

Sandy Cameron, chair of the parole board, said the aim of the board is to reduce the risk to the public as far as possible.

"We would always look at whether there are additional conditions we can put in place to protect the public," he said. "There are quite clear constraints and messages to the licencee and tools for the supervisor to ensure compliance.

"We would expect the supervising officer to come back to us if they felt additional conditions were required."

Professor Mike Nellis, an expert in tagging at Glasgow University, said: "There is a line of argument that says the longer you spend tagged, the more intolerable it becomes. People can put up with staying in under curfew for months but if it extends to much longer than that the risk of breach is greatly increased.

"In parts of the US such as Florida they have started tagging sex offenders for life, but the only way that is going to work is if there is a great deal of flexibility.

"If we are going to breach people for running 10 minutes late it is never going to work."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.



Posted by: Guga, Rockall on 4:53am Mon 30 Apr 07
These perverts should never be released; the more so when they are considered to be a risk to society.

Perverts always re-offend; they can never be "cured", and even chemical castration does not always work. While it would be preferable to have them put down, if we are not going to do that they should never be released to be an ongoing danger to society.

However, the only way we are going to stop all the touchy feely treehuggers and trendies allowing them out, tagged or otherwise, is for anyone attacked by these perverts to sue both the parole boards and the government. The government has a duty of care to the public, and should be made to pay, one way or another, for not exercising that duty of care.
Posted by: meg, Fife on 6:35am Mon 30 Apr 07
just like the idiot who murdered someone while he was tagged because he killed the person in the place he lived! stayed well inside the "system" and as long as the ones who pronounce these sentences are safe they don't give a buggery about society.
Posted by: The Glasgow Ranger, Edinburgh on 7:54am Mon 30 Apr 07
They should never be released and the public put at risk with the flawed tagging system.Castrate them.
Posted by: Colin Armstrong, Durham City,North - East, England on 9:57am Mon 30 Apr 07
The judicial system has a duty to protect us,the public, I feel incensed that they have done this, I see it as an abdication of their responsabilities. Like others have said,if these people are so dangerous dont tagg them. Protect us from them and lock them up.
Posted by: Theo, Richmond, Va. USA on 11:01am Mon 30 Apr 07
I agree with all of you. A tag, unless it it buried in the body somewhere like the tags that registered pets get or the tags to keep someone from stealing something in a store are inserted are the only useful way to to monitor a dangerous person. Any external monitor can be cut off and the criminal just disappears!
In America if a person is being reviewed for parole the victims of his crimes (assuming they are still alive!) can petition the board to not release. A victim has the right to go in front of a Judge and petition for a ruling to keep the criminal incarcerated.
In many cases if the crimes were that bad the then declared criminal would have been executed after trials and appeals. Maybe somebody will find some of these guns that don't exist because of your laws against them and might decide to take care of the situation. There have been many cases of that very thing being carried out by the victim, a loved one, or a friend. I am certainly not saying this action is OK but it is a fact that it does happen. I wonder if the Parole board thought of this? After all aren't your criminals, who are released, also entitled to protection by the government just like honest people?
Posted by: Pagan, France on 12:14pm Mon 30 Apr 07
Comforting to know that Scots judging by the preceding comments have given up on Christianity and all that nonsense.
Posted by: J Scott, Prestwick on 2:38pm Mon 30 Apr 07
Most right thinking individuals will consider it ridiculous that offenders who are considered to be such high risk are ever released back into the community in the first place. It's bad enough Parole Boards constantly granting early release only to be proved wrong in their judgement , but it beggars belief that apparently it's now acceptable to release offenders in the almost certain knowledge that they will re-offend.
Posted by: Thomas, Glasgow on 3:35pm Mon 30 Apr 07
If a risk is great then the individuals should remain in secured accommodation sine die. The law as it should be is two fold; to punish and then protect in the future. A young thief may learn his lesson and never re offend. For too many sexual offenders they appear to hunt humans and whilst at large will always be a danger. Personally, I believe any parole board member or person concerned in the release of such offenders should give a 100pc guarantee of no reoffending on pain of instant dismissal from their job. Finally Professor Nellis is wrong. People are not ten minutes late. They have invariably known for hours what time they should be at a location. Thus any lateness is ten minutes plus x hours.
Posted by: John, Ayr on 4:22pm Tue 1 May 07
Funny how the do-gooders are missing from the comments so far.

If the Do-Gooders had to live next door to the people who are at risk of re-offending, if they or their friends / relatives were to be targeted by an offender. Then you could bet your last penny that they would immediately change how they would want to treat the offender.

In my opinion, people who are a danger to society should NOT be able to mix FREELY in society.
Posted by: Elizabeth, California on 12:18am Wed 2 May 07
What happens in a year or two, when one parole officer has left the job and passed the files over to someone else, and then the problems begin, I heard where one of the parolees got the moniter off his leg, and went out on the prowl again, And it is quite true that the person or their relatives can go to the parole board and ask that the prisoner not be release this happened, and he was never released.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use