Jack McConnell has warned of another round of upheaval in local taxation within five years if a local income tax is introduced, forecasting it would prove unpopular.
The Scottish Labour leader conceded the current council tax is controversial and unpopular and said he would like to find an alternative that is popular, stable and fairer, suggesting that could be partly based on income level. This is despite Labour attacking the SNP and LibDems for wanting to replace council tax with a local income tax, saying Scotland would become the highest taxed part of Britain.
"You should only replace the council tax if you have a sustainable system that raises the £2bn it raises now, on which there is some consensus," said Mr McConnell. "We're in danger of sleepwalking into changes in local government finance where the consequences are not being spelled out and it would be so controversial and disruptive that we'd have to change back again."
Speaking at a public event organised by The Herald, Mr McConnell challenged other parties over university funding.
There was also a warning yesterday from the principal of St Andrews University to the SNP, LibDems and Greens who want to abolish the graduate endowment, saying higher education needs more funding to compete rather than cutting off graduate contributions.
Elsewhere on the campaign trail, the SNP rolled out more business and celebrity endorsements, while Tory leader Annabel Goldie criticised the Labour and LibDem parties for their "incompetence" leading to the Union being under threat.
Prime Minister Tony Blair was in Eastwood and Kilmarnock, warning about tax rises resulting from SNP plans, while Alex Salmond squashed suggestions that some taxes could rise in an independent Scotland.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article