BBC chiefs were branded "mad" by MPs yesterday over the axing of popular newsreader Moira Stuart from her regular Sunday morning slot.
Members of the House of Commons Media Committee also raised the allegation that the corporation had been ageist, racist and sexist in its controversial decision.
Such a claim, however, was vehemently denied by Mark Thompson, the BBC's director-general, when he appeared before MPs.
He explained that Ms Stuart, 55, had been removed from her regular appearance on Andrew Marr's Sunday AM programme, leaving her with no regular slot, because the role of the traditional newsreader had "virtually died out".
Conservative MP Nigel Evans asked whether the BBC Trust had anything to say about the "appalling decision to sack Moira Stuart". He asked: "Has anyone telephoned you to say: Are you mad? Moira Stuart is one of the most popular newsreaders in the BBC.' We're reading comments that the BBC is ageist."
Mr Thompson praised Ms Stuart, saying she was much loved "by her colleagues as well as the public". He explained: "The question of what happens to Moira in the future is something we're discussing with Moira."
The BBC chief said he wanted to refute the suggestion that either ageism, sexism or racism lay at the root of the decision to drop Ms Stuart. "BBC News, News 24, the radio networks have changed over the years and the traditional role of the newsreader, as opposed to a correspondent or presenter, has virtually died out over the services," said Mr Thompson.
Citing the example of the 10 O'Clock News and BBC Breakfast News, he said: "We tend to use journalists across BBC news programmes to read the news headlines."
The director-general insisted Ms Stuart was "very valued and much-loved". He added: "When she does programmes beyond the news - she did that quite brilliant programme on William Wilberforce - she shows her range of talents."
However, Mr Evans, the MP for Ribble Valley in Lancashire, replied: "If this is how you treat someone that's much-loved, I'd hate to see how you treat someone you don't like."
Since news of her removal emerged last month, demands have been growing for the reinstatement of Britain's first black woman newsreader.
Although she has not said anything publicly, the veteran broadcaster was said to be "very disappointed" to lose her role in what she considered to be her main job. Many popular broadcasters have called for her to be reinstated, including John Humphrys, who presents Radio 4's Today programme.
He noted: "It may be pure coincidence but there do seem to be remarkably few women with a few lines on their faces presenting TV news or current affairs compared with the wrinkled men."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article