It is a modern day phenomenon which has given rise to a new coinage: Tescopoly.
From Paisley to Japan, the seemingly inexorable expansion of Tesco continues apace.
As the UK's largest supermarket chain announced yesterday it will open its first store under its own name in Japan later this month - continuing its push into overseas markets - it also emerged that it has agreed to buy one of Scotland's oldest football grounds in the centre of the country's biggest town.
Groaning under the weight of a multi-million pound debt, St Mirren have long been searching for a buyer for their outdated Love Street stadium in Paisley.
The deal with Tesco will allow the club to wipe their debts and take possession of a brand new stadium in Paisley, built by the supermarket chain.
However, it seems whenever Tesco decides to build a new store controversy is not far behind, and the supermarket chain is becoming used to being cast as the new corporate villain on the block.
A groundswell of opposition greeted its proposal to develop a massive site in Partick in the west end of Glasgow, where it plans to build a 24-hour store, 900 student flats and create 580 parking spaces. More than 1000 letters of objection have been lodged with the city council.
Previous applications to build stores by the chain have been defeated in Inverness and Portobello, as locals organise themselves against what they see as the "Tescopolisation" of their communities.
Environmental campaigners have branded the company as a juggernaut which must be stopped, but not everyone is opposed to its latest plan.
St Mirren have been desperate to vacate Love Street, which has been home to the club since 1895, to allow them to build a Premier League-compliant stadium. The team had to sell to a supermarket chain, as selling the site for housing would only raise half of the estimated £10m a retail sale would realise.
Planning permission for a supermarket was granted by Renfrewshire Council in 2005, on the condition that a new stadium for St Mirren be built in the Ferguslie Park area before Love Street is demolished.The club thought they had reached a deal with Sainsbury's last year, but the company pulled out in August.
Tesco has yet to submit its proposals to council planners, but has agreed in principle the purchase of Love Street.
Reaction in Paisley, whose town centre has become a retail desert since the opening of the nearby Braehead shopping mall, is mixed.
"My gut reaction is that this is a bad thing," said Stewart Farmer, the west of Scotland organiser for the Federation of Small Businesses Scotland.
"Paisley town centre is severely compromised as it is, and a supermarket at Love Street can only add to the problems small businesses there already face. This certainly won't make it any better."
There is a worry that the market is already too crowded. Just three-and-a-half miles from Love Street, in the Renfrewshire town of Linwood, Tesco is planning to take over the entire town centre, which is semi-derelict at the moment.
It promises to build new community facilities such as a library and town hall alongside its supermarket.
Tesco, the world's fifth-largest retailer, posted profits of £2.55bn on Monday. In the time it takes the average person to read this article the chain will have made about £10,000 profit.
Tesco refutes claims that it has a stranglehold on British shoppers and supermarket real estate and claims the existence of so-called "Tesco towns" such as Inverness, where it has three stores and takes 51p of every £1 spent on groceries, is a myth.
Last night Nick Gellatly, Tesco Corporate Affairs Manager, said: "We are committed to investing both in Linwood and more widely in Renfrewshire. However, we do not comment on speculation regarding our wider development programme."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article