The judge who sentenced Saddam Hussein to hang for crimes against the Iraqi people has asked for political asylum in Britain.
Raouf Abdul Rahman is understood to be seeking sanctuary in the UK after he and his family received death threats from insurgents linked to the former ruling Ba'ath Party.
The judge, a Kurd, took control of Saddam's trial in Baghdad last year to end a series of interruptions by defendants and political speeches which had reduced the legal process to chaos and extended the hearing by months.
He also told Saddam at one stage to remember he was a prisoner on trial for his life and no longer the dictator of Iraq.
Judge Rahman was appointed by the fledgling Iraqi government largely because he had no ethnic or vested religious ties with the Shia or Sunni sects of Islam and was regarded as "serious and honest" by his fellow judges.
Critics said he would be biased because he was born in Halabja, the Kurdish town where 5000 civilians - mostly women and children - died in a chemical warfare attack ordered by the former Iraqi president in 1988.
Some of his relatives were among the victims, although he lost no immediate family members in the mustard gas and nerve agent bombardment.
Rahman, 64, graduated from Baghdad University in 1963 and worked as a lawyer in the Iraqi capital and in the northern city of Sulamaniyah before being appointed chief judge of the Kurdistan appeals court in 1996.
A Whitehall source said yesterday: "Judge Rahman is seeking asylum because he and his family have been told they will be killed for passing sentence on Saddam Hussein.
"He feels he could never lead a normal life free from that threat, especially when US and UK forces withdraw from Iraq in the next few years. He, his two sons and a daughter, would then be completely vulnerable."
The Home Office has refused to confirm or deny Judge Rahman's approach. A spokesman said: "For obvious reasons, we never discuss individual cases."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article