logo
   Web Issue 3233 August 22 2008   
spacer
Lawyers demand legal aid reforms
DAVID LEASKMarch 10 2007

Lawyers yesterday demanded reform of civil legal aid rules which they say have turned swathes of Scotland into "advice deserts".

Many Scots are finding it all but impossible to find a solicitor willing to take on a civil case, especially a family law matter, on legal aid.

The reason, claim lawyers, is that payment is made in a lump sum that has no bearing on the amount of work involved.

A motion calling for change in the way the aid is paid was passed unanimously at the Law Society of Scotland's annual general meeting.

Caroline Flanagan, a family law specialist who sits on the society's ruling council, told the AGM: "There is already anecdotal evidence of advice deserts appearing in parts of Scotland with solicitors stopping civil legal aid work.

"We need the profession to provide hard evidence so that we can present a strong case to the Scottish Executive. We need to be able to show where and why solicitors are not being paid sufficiently and the effect that this is having on the public's access to legal advice."

The executive introduced block payment fees for civil legal aid work in 2003. Yesterday, an executive spokesman said officials were well aware of emerging concerns. He said: "A number of steps are being taken to ensure there is a nationwide supply of legal aid services to provide access to justice for individuals.

"Last year we announced that the Scottish Legal Aid Board is to develop a network of publicly employed solicitors to provide extra help to the public in matters of civil law in areas where there may be unmet demand, so that people get the advice they need from whoever is best placed to provide it.

"In addition, the Legal Profession and Legal Aid (Scotland) Act enables grant funding to be given to non-lawyers to provide expertise in specialist areas."


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: LJPR LEGAL JUDICIAL POLITICAL REFORMERS, west coast on 9:07am Sat 10 Mar 07
We will all need to get our hankies oot fur the poor legal fraternity.
Our group have seen the damage being done by lawyers in family law who are on legal aid for 10 years and more .
The legal aid board are made up of lawyers and judges ,not a majority of lay people,who's judgement is based more on cosy legal relationships , rather than a real need to ensure justice.

If you see the effect on children and fathers,and the occasional mother , who have spent years being dragged through courts and bullied and abused using sheriff officers and police to run riot around the victims human rights you will KNOW legal aid is a RACKET.

Perjury is rife in civil/family courts,NO juries,NO recording,NO openness and the lies and deceit used by the abusers of public moneys ,LEGAL AID LAWYERS is maybe one of the most disgusting and humiliating experiences anyone can be put through.

The bleating legal fraternity should look at Gordon Jackson and Donald Findlay and the public moneys,via legal aid , being used to give them an affluent lifestyle most of their clients only dream about .

Until Scotlands VICTIMS force the clean up of Scotlands court by the mobsters controlling them with NO SIGN OF JUSTICE they can bleat all they like.Few if any legal aid claims ultimately lead to justice while ALL our due process's are being undermined by those who manipulate Scotlands laws to their own long term financial advantage.

LJPR LEGAL JUDICIAL POLITICAL REFORMERS

Posted by: Big Wullie, Glasgow on 7:17pm Sat 10 Mar 07
I have complained about Jim Keegan Solicitor since 1982 and can prove that before my trial he never interviewed 17 of 19 defence witnesses.
He Told Lies to SCCRC when he said the Crown Statements would not have been available to him at the time of my trial. Does this then mean he went to court with no statements from my witnesses then?.
The Law society is a joke, They claimed this was not professional Misconduct but professional SERVICE. What do they mean by this.
This lump sum" did this occur in 1982 in criminal cases maybe this would explain why Jim Keegan never bothered to prepare a proper defence on my behalf. He should be struck off and not allowed to prctice.
Please view video below and take time to read all comments to see how corrupt SCCRC are

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WhJUjhequ4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_GPX41Yt9U
Posted by: Peter Cherbi, Edinburgh on 1:31am Mon 12 Mar 07
Lawyers seem to have given up their courtroom gowns for the atire of a Highwayman.

Recent research by the Law Society of Scotland itself, proved that legal aid payments had actually increased, and coupled with the recent strike action by 'family lawyers' to boycott cases from domestic abuse to even criminal cases of sex offenders ... they got their way, and again, increases in legal aid payments were announced.

Would it not be better to just bring into use, parts of legislation from the Law Reform (Misc Provisions) Act 1990, which opens up the rights of representation in court so that consumers can have a wider choice ... surely this would be an improvement over the Law Society gang regularly holding up the Legal Aid Stagecoach for more silver ...
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:
spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use