A controversial new recruitment system for junior doctors is to be reviewed amid claims the whole process is "fatally flawed".
Doctors and consultants - some in Scotland - have suggested some of the most able candidates have not been shortlisted for interviews.
Now the Department of Health has launched an inquiry amid concern that qualifications and achievements have not been sufficiently taken into account during shortlisting and that candidates have not been rated in a consistent fashion.
The review follows an emergency meeting between Secretary of State Patricia Hewitt and leading UK doctors who have raised a number of concerns about the new system.
Last year The Herald highlighted fears among doctors that they could be posted anywhere in Scotland under the new regime and that many people would be left outside the mainstream training programme and struggle to further their careers.
As concerns grew, doctors in England mounted a campaign calling for the introduction of the new process to be postponed.
The allegations that staff without the right qualifications were being invited to shortlist interviews were made last month as the British Medication Association warned the actual applications machinery had descended into pandemonium with computer problems.
This week a panel of consultants in Birmingham refused to conduct job interviews on the grounds they were unfair.
Yesterday the association said this Medical Training Application Service (MTAS) was fatally flawed.
It is the way MTAS has operated which will now be reviewed, with Westminster promising the process will be complete before the application system enters its second phase next month - when doctors are offered posts and others enter a clearing system where they apply for remaining vacancies.
Professor Neil Douglas, president of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, is to lead a working group which is overseeing the review.
He said: "It is clear that MTAS has caused confusion and concern to many doctors throughout the UK. I am pleased that the department of health has recognised the severity of the situation and has ordered an immediate review to identify what went wrong and to ensure that such mistakes are not made again. It is clear that lessons will have to be learned from this experience if we are to restore professional confidence in this system."
Under the old training system doctors who had completed their first years in hospital following university would progress through a series of training grades by applying for different advertised posts as they worked their way towards qualifying as a consultant.
The new system centralises entry into a more concentrated training programme. Candidates can apply to join a finite number of training programmes in different medical fields and different geographical regions. Around 30,000 junior doctors have applied for 22,000 training places UK-wide following the shake-up.
Concern has been mounting about the way the system has operated with representatives from the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Glasgow (RCPSG) saying they had "lost all confidence in the process."
Dr Paul Knight, registrar with the RCPSG, said: "While the evidence at this stage is anecdotal, the reports consistently show serious problems with the system.
"We are frustrated because we raised many of these issues with the department of health and were given constant reassurance that the system would be fit for purpose. This is very evidently not the case."
Dr Graeme Eunson, chair of the BMA's Scottish Junior Doctors Committee, said most of the problems reported in Scotland were related to trainees who had applied for jobs in England. He said there were three specialist areas, gastroenterology, anaesthesia and emergency medicine where issues with candidate selection had been flagged up in Scotland. The body in charge of the process up here, he said, had decided to interview all applicants to these programmes because of this.
The health department said the terms of reference for the review were "to understand what has worked and not worked to date, identify and promote good practice, recommend action to remedy any weaknesses, taking account of legal and operational constraints and identify specifically what further action or guidance is required."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article