A new global agreement to tackle climate change was announced by politicians yesterday, on the day that greenhouse gas concentrations reached a record high.
The world's major industrial nations, including the US, signed a resolution urging the G8 governments to commit to setting new targets for limiting greenhouse gas emissions.
They want an agreement ready by 2009, to succeed the Kyoto Protocol which is set to expire in 2012.
Although the declaration is non-binding, it is seen as representing a mood shift over global warming, particularly in America, where the administration refused to sign up to Kyoto.
The two-day meeting brought together legislators from the G8 nations plus Brazil, China, India, Mexico and South Africa.
It was organised by British-led environmental group Global Legislators Organisation for a Balanced Environment.
The delegates called for a new worldwide carbon trading scheme to cap CO2 emissions and urged developing world countries to sign up to emissions cuts. However, Greenpeace warned that the group's agreed target for global atmospheric CO2 concentration, which is 450-550 parts per million, could result in "a climate catastrophe".
At those levels, climate scientists predict there would be an increase in temperature of between two and four degrees - enough to leave an extra billion people without water.
Meanwhile, levels of the greenhouse gas widely blamed for causing global warming have jumped to record highs in the atmosphere. Kim Holmen, research director of the Norwegian Polar Institute, reported that concentrations of carbon dioxide had risen to 390 parts per million (ppm) from 388 a year ago.
Levels have hit peaks almost every year in recent decades, bolstering theories of warming, and are far above 270 ppm before the industrial revolution of the 18th century. This year's unusually high rise is apparently stoked by rising emissions from Asian industry, said Mr Holmen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article