The director of a flagship campus has described as a "kick in the face" plans by his university to pull out of the project set up to regenerate the south of Scotland.
Glasgow University is expected to withdraw from the Crichton campus in Dumfries, the UK's first multiversity, because it is running at an £800,000-a-year loss.
Speaking publicly for the first time about the decision, Ted Cowan, who is also professor of Scottish history at the university, called the campus community "innocent victims" caught up in an apparent "stand-off" between the institution and the Scottish Funding Council over financing the project.
He said: "We have done everything that's been asked of us. We really are on a cusp and Glasgow has always said it would stay if there had been adequate funding. But it seems our achievements were not good enough to persuade the council we should receive additional funding, so this heartbreaking decision has been arrived at. We feel like we've been kicked in the face."
Mr Cowan reiterated calls made last week for Jack McConnell to intervene to save the facility in an area "already ignored in Scottish Executive funding terms". Losing the leading university's presence in the area would be "a tragedy for the economy and culture of the whole of southern Scotland", said Mr Cowan. With a formal decision to withdraw from Crichton expected to be taken at the university's court meeting on Wednesday, UCU Scotland, the lecturers' union, has urged the First Minister to intervene.
The union has also asked the university court to postpone a decision until after the next spending review, which, it claimed, may lead to an increase in funding for higher education.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article