Councils could be forced to refund more than £20m after overcharging the elderly for care costs, it was claimed last night, as Edinburgh accepted it owed more than £2m.
The Tories said the Scottish Executive should foot the bill, as it had issued muddled guidance on what councils could charge.
In a report going to councillors next week, Edinburgh City Council says it has been prompted into action by an independent legal opinion on the regulations governing free personal care.
Peter Gabbitas, director of health and social care, said the council should use its reserves to make a one-off payment of £2.1m to a total of 820 people. A council source added there could be a further £1m owed to others, while ending the overcharging adds new annual costs of £1m.
The council's decision flows from confusing regulations governing which aspects of personal care councils can charge for. In 2002 and 2003, the executive said councils could not charge for "food preparation and provision of meals (at home)".
However, it was acceptable to charge for "assistance with eating, assistance to manage special diets and the assistance with the preparation of specialist meals (eg pureed foods)".
On the basis of this advice, Edinburgh began charging some people for receiving meals and food preparation at home. However, in September 2004 the executive wrote to councils saying the guidance was "inconsistent" with the 2002 act introducing free personal care.
Assistance with the preparation of food was not chargeable, ministers said, and promised further guidance "in due course". This emerged in May 2006, but only added to the confusion.
Edinburgh, therefore, decided last September to commission an independent legal opinion. It now concludes that, since July 2002, when the free personal care law came into effect, the council "has not had the power to charge clients for assisting with the preparation of food".
In his report, Mr Gabbitas said: "Although the council acted in good faith, charges levied have been ultra vires. People illegally charged have a claim for repayment "
He said similar opinions had been obtained by "several other councils" and added that Edinburgh council would forward its report to the executive and ask it to "reimburse the council for this unbudgeted expenditure".
David McLetchie, Tory MSP for Edinburgh Pentlands, last night wrote to the Deputy Health Minister calling for a definitive statement on the issue.
"All Scottish councils should refund people wrongly charged. That will cost around £20m.
"Since the fault lies firmly with the Scottish Executive, it should stump up and make a special grant allocation to councils to cover the cost of refunds."
Cosla, the council umbrella group, said the Edinburgh decision did not necessarily mean all councils would have to follow suit. A spokesman urged the executive to deliver definitive "clarity" on the issue.
The executive said all councils were adequately funded to deliver free personal and nursing care. "(The 2002 Act) makes explicit that assistance with the preparation of food should not be charged for. We are aware that there are some variations in local authorities' interpretations of the act," a spokesman said.
"We have conducted extensive research into the operation of the Free Personal Care Policy. This is due to published in the coming months."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article