PRESSURE mounted yesterday to postpone a controversial new system of recruiting junior doctors to specialist posts after a poll showed widespread opposition from medical professionals.
A survey of more than 1700 people, including more than 400 consultants, by Cambridge University Professor Morris Brown found that most want the Modernising Medical Careers (MMC) application process dropped.
However, the poll came as some of Scotland's most senior clinicians rallied round the new system, illustrating the rift in medical opinion the new Medical Training Application Service (MTAS) has created.
In a letter to The Herald today, Dr Harry Burns, Scotland's chief medical officer, and the leaders of the British Medical Association (BMA) in Scotland and the royal colleges, defend MMC as a necessary modernisation of the training process which would make appointments fairer and lead to a better standard of care for patients.
The rift comes as hundreds of doctors are due to march in Glasgow and London tomorrow over MTAS, which has seen around 30,000 junior doctors apply for some 22,000 training posts.
Both the BMA and the royal colleges in Edinburgh and Glasgow have backed MMC while expressing reservations about the timing and method of its implementation.
However, Remedy UK, a breakaway organisation opposed to the reforms, has mounted a more widespread offensive against MMC, which it says will lead to a dramatic cut in the number of hours consultants and other specialists train.
An open letter to the British Medical Journal today warns that the future of medical research in the UK is under threat from the new recruitment and training process.
Professor John Bell, president of the Academy of Medical Sciences and Professor Sir John Tooke, chairman of the Council of Heads of Medical Schools, said the government's vision of the UK as a world-class centre for biomedical research and healthcare could "not be realised" without a research-oriented medical workforce.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article