PAMELA HESS
WASHINGTON
A Syrian nuclear reactor allegedly built with North Korean help and destroyed last year by Israeli jets was within weeks or months of being functional, a top American official claimed yesterday.
The facility was mostly complete but still needed testing before it could be declared operational, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.
However, no uranium, which is needed to fuel a reactor, was evident at the remote site along the Euphrates River in in eastern Syria.
The reactor was similar in design to a North Korean reactor at Yongbyon that has produced small amounts of plutonium, US officials said. Plutonium is highly radioactive and can be used to make powerful nuclear weapons or radiological bombs.
Top members of a congressional intelligence committee said after being briefed on the facility by intelligence and administration officials that the reactor posed a serious threat of spreading dangerous nuclear materials.
"This is a serious proliferation issue, both for the Middle East and the countries that may be involved in Asia," said Pete Hoekstra, a Republican congressman, after the closed-doors hearing.
CIA director Michael Hayden, director of national intelligence Mike McConnell and national security adviser Stephen Hadley briefed politicians, who were shown intelligence information that the administration contends establishes a strong link between North Korea's nuclear programme and the bombed Syrian site.
Hoekstra and committee chairman Silvestre Reyes, a Democrat, were angry that the Bush administration had delayed briefing the committee for eight months.
The Syrian site has been veiled in secrecy until now, with intelligence and government officials refusing to confirm the site was for a nuclear reactor.
White House press secretary Dana Perino said Bush stood by the statement he made in October 2006 when he described North Korea as one of the leading proliferators of missile technology, including transfers to Iran and Syria. The briefings come at a critical time in the diplomatic effort to get North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons.
Syria has signed an international treaty requiring it to disclose nuclear interests and activity. The intelligence shines a light on its alleged malfeasance and makes it easier for Israel to explain its decision to destroy the site.
Syria has not declared the alleged reactor to the International Atomic Energy Agency, nor was it under international safeguards, possibly putting Syria in breach of an international nuclear non-proliferation treaty.
In the Syrian capital, Damascus, Suleiman Haddad, head of the foreign relations committee, said the videotape did not deserve a response.
"America is looking for any problem in order to accuse Syria," Haddad said, adding: "America is trying to create an atmosphere of war in the region."
Israeli warplanes bombed the site in Syria on September 6. A new, larger building has been constructed in its place.
In breaking its official silence on the Israeli air strike, the Bush administration is taking the risk that Syria could be angered by the public disclosures and could seek to retaliate against Israel.
US officials were also briefing the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, at its base in Vienna.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article