logo
   Web Issue 3239 August 29 2008   
spacer




Aid groups warn war in Afghanistan ‘just beginning’
IAN BRUCE, Defence CorrespondentJanuary 21 2008

The war in Afghanistan is "only just beginning", according to a report published this week by the international body established to oversee the work of non-governmental aid agencies in the country.

In contrast to Western claims that progress is being made, the Afghanistan NGO Security Office (Anso) says: "The consensus among informed individuals at the end of 2007 seems to be that Afghanistan is at the beginning of a war, not the end of one: 2007 will likely be looked back upon as the year in which the Taliban seriously rejoined the fight. With the Taliban resurgent, it has become obvious that their easy departure in 2001 after the US-led invasion was more of a strategic retreat than an actual military defeat," the report adds.

Taliban insurgents, fighting to overthrow the pro-Western Afghan government and eject foreign forces, carried out more attacks over a wider area in 2007, Anso claims, and the best-case scenario for this year, is "more of the same".

The Taliban are most active in their traditional heartlands in the south and east of the country, but have extended attacks to the other areas.

The Nato-led International Security Assistance Forces (Isaf) has some 41,000 troops in Afghanistan, including more than 7000 UK soldiers.

But due to restrictions on how and where most European troops are deployed and excluding the necessary support troops, Isaf cannot field more than 5000 to 7000 combat soldiers, Anso estimates.

The US announced last week that it plans to deploy 3200 Marines - 2000 of them in the British and Canadian sectors of Helmand and Kandahar - to forestall an expected Taliban spring offensive.

Western politicians and Nato commanders say they are making progress, claiming to have pre-empted an insurgent spring offensive last year and are building up Afghan security forces.

"We totally disagree with those who assert that the spring offensive' did not happen and would instead argue that a four-fold increase in armed opposition group initiated attacks between February to July constitutes a very clear-cut offensive," Anso said.

In the absence of a huge increase in military commitment, the best-case scenario for 2008 was "more of the same", with Taliban insurgents expanding their influence in the countryside and aid groups being forced to retreat into the safety of the cities.

More than 6000 people were killed in 2007 in the bloodiest year since 2001.


© All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.


Posted by: Edwin, Glasgow on 7:38am Mon 21 Jan 08
As was pointed out when the egregious Reid talked about not a shot being fired by British troops in Afghanistan, all that was necessary was to read Flashman. It's all there.
Posted by: Neil, Gloucestershire, England on 9:22am Mon 21 Jan 08
The Afghan people have defeated the British Army in the 19th century, the Soviet Army in the 21st century, and I predict they will eventually get rid of the Western invaders in the 21st century. Will the senseless Western politicians ever learn?
Posted by: donald, glasgow on 9:30am Mon 21 Jan 08
Lord Reid of Parkheid is now defending the Forces of the Crown at his London Road Labour bunker.
Posted by: bill on 10:10am Mon 21 Jan 08
Three questions.

Why did we invade Afghanistan?
What have we accomplished?
Why are we still there?

These questions were being asked two centuries ago, and the same answers apply.
Add your comment
Please note: to publish your comment you must be registered on this site. If you are already registered, please enter your details below.
Email:
Password:




spacer
 IN YOUR AREA
 
Herald Appointments - Every Friday
Travel Shop
Airport Parking
Travel Insurance
Copyright © 2008 Newsquest (Herald & Times) Limited. All Rights Reserved   
Sitemap :: Circulation :: Syndication :: Advertising :: About Us :: Terms of Use