NATO and US jets carried out 20 times as many bombing missions in Afghanistan last year as in 2005, with the bulk of the raids in support of UK and Canadian troops fighting in Helmand and Kandahar.
The number of airstrikes reached 3572 in 2007, twice the rate of 2006, Nato's International Support and Assistance Force said yesterday. There were between 170 and 180 such missions in 2005.
Human-rights groups monitoring the counter-insurgency campaign said there were about 300 Afghan civilian fatalities as a result of targeting errors or mistaken identity last year, triple the rate for 2006.
US Central Command, which co-ordinates all alliance air activity, said many strikes were in support of small, special forces teams engaging Taliban insurgents in remote areas beyond easy reach for conventional ground units.
British soldiers have fired more than 4.7 million rounds of rifle and machine-gun ammunition in actions which were described by their officers as the most intensive since the Korean War.
Meanwhile, Duncan Hunter, the senior Republican politician on the US congressional armed services committee, has accused America's European allies of shirking dangerous duty in Afghanistan.
He also called for the reversal of an order to send 3200 US Marines to Afghanistan to help counter an expected Taliban spring offensive.
Mr Hunter wrote to General James Conway, the US Marines' commandant, to say: "Installation of a new presence in Afghanistan will signal to recalcitrant allies that Uncle Sam is willing to allow them to shirk their fair burden in this war."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article