MATT SPETALNICK
Iran is a destabilising force in Iraq, George W Bush insisted yesterday, despite Tehran's assertion to Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al Maliki that it was helping secure his country.
Calling Iran a "very troubling nation" that should be isolated, Bush warned at a White House news conference: "When we catch you playing a non-constructive role in Iraq, there will be a price to pay."
Bush spoke as al Maliki, facing deepening political woes at home and US criticism for lack of progress in bridging sectarian divisions, won pledges of support from Shi'ite Iran during his visit there.
Playing down signs of warming ties between Baghdad and Tehran, Bush - who is struggling to rally US support for the unpopular Iraq war - voiced confidence that he and Maliki saw eye-to-eye on Iran as a threat to Iraqi security.
"If the signal from al Maliki is that Iran is constructive, I will have to have a heart-to-heart with my friend, the prime minister. Because I don't believe they are constructive," Bush said. "I don't think he, in his heart of heart, think they're constructive either."
It was the second time this week that Bush has had to defend his tough stance on Iran in the face of possible differences with a key ally.
He warned Afghan President Hamid Karzai on Monday to be more suspicious of Iran after the Afghan leader had brushed aside US accusations that Tehran was arming the Taliban.
ITehran denies Washington's accusations that it is supplying weapons to militants in Iran to stoke violence, and instead blames the US military presence. Iranian leaders vowed their support for Iraq's security, but in talks with al Maliki stuck by their stance that real peace would only come when US forces pull out.
"Establishment of peace and tranquillity in Iraq depends on withdrawal of occupiers and their avoidance of interfering in Iraq," said Iranian Vice President Parviz Davoodi.
In Iraq itself, hundreds of thousands of Shi'ite pilgrims made their way on foot to a shrine in the north of Baghdad yesterday, praying for safety at an annual rite whose past two years have been marred by violence.
Pilgrims waved flags, chanted and beat their chests in a traditional gesture of ritual mourning. Others carried the symbolic green coffin of Imam Musa Kadhim, a Shi'ite martyr imprisoned and poisoned in Baghdad 1200 years ago.
Many had walked for days from distant towns in intense heat to reach the shrine where Kadhim is buried.
"Of course, I am afraid. But God willing I will come home safe," said Um Khaled, a woman in black robes. "I have made this pilgrimage every year, it will not stop me," she said of the threat of violence.
There were far fewer reports of violence than on a typical Baghdad day. A roadside bomb in southern Baghdad killed three people. Three soldiers were wounded by gunmen in an attack that police earlier had said hit pilgrims.
Two years ago, nearly 1000 pilgrims were killed in a stampede on a bridge near the shrine sparked by rumours of a suicide bomber, the single most deadly incident since the US-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.
Last year, gunmen, some on rooftops, ambushed pilgrims on the way to the shrine, killing 20 and wounding 300.
In the US, all charges were dropped yesterday against a US Marine accused of killing three Iraqis in Haditha - a massacre that resulted in the biggest US criminal case involving civilian deaths to come out of the Iraq war.
Marine Lance Corporal Justin Sharrat was accused of killing three Iraqi brothers in response to a 2005 roadside bombing in the Iraqi city.
Military authorities have said that after the bombing, a group of marines went on a rampage, killing 24 Iraqi men, women and children.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article