GILLIAN FLACCUS
LOS ANGELES
Hundreds of people who claim they were abused by clergy in the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles can expect to be paid more than $1m each in a $660m (£324m) settlement of their lawsuits.
The deal is by far the largest settlement in the church's sexual abuse scandal. The archdiocese, America's largest, and the plaintiffs were due to hold a news conference today.
An anonymous source with knowledge of the deal placed its value at $660m, by far the largest payout in the church's sexual abuse scandal.
The amount would average a little more than $1.3m (£650,000) per plaintiff.
The case had been due to go to trial today in Los Angeles Superior Court, focusing on 12 plaintiffs who accused former priest Clinton Hagenbach of molesting them. Hagenbach died two decades ago.
Had the case gone to trial, lawyers had sought to put Cardinal Roger Mahony, Archbishop of Los Angeles, in the uncomfortable position of testifying about the Church's response to abuses dating from the 1940s to the 1990s.
A judge overseeing the cases recently cleared the way for four people to seek punitive damages - something that could have opened the church to tens of millions of dollars in payouts if the ruling had been expanded to other cases.
The settlement also calls for the release of confidential priest personnel files after review by a judge assigned to oversee the litigation, said Ray Boucher, a lawyer for one of the lead plaintiffs.
The settlements push the total amount paid out by the US church since 1950 to more than $2bn, with about one-quarter of that coming from the Los Angeles archdiocese.
A judge must sign off on the agreement.
The release of the priest documents was important to the agreement, Boucher said, because it could reveal whether archdiocesan leaders had been involved in covering up for abusive priests.
"Transparency is a critical part of this and of all resolutions," he said.
The settlement is the largest by a Roman Catholic diocese since the clergy sexual abuse scandal erupted in Boston in 2002.
Facing a flood of abuse claims, five dioceses - Tucson, Arizona; Spokane, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Davenport, Iowa, and San Diego - sought bankruptcy protection.
David Clohessy, national director of SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, said the deal was by far the largest group settlement with the Catholic Church, although a handful of plaintiffs have received greater amounts on an individual basis than each is to receive from this settlement.
"It is never about the money," Clohessy said. "Victims want healing, prevention, closing, accountability."
The Los Angeles archdiocese, its insurers and various Roman Catholic orders have paid more than $114m to settle 86 claims so far.
The largest of those came in December, when the archdiocese reached a $60m settlement with 45 people whose claims dated from before the mid-1950s and after 1987 - periods when it had little or no sexual abuse insurance.
Some Roman Catholic orders will be carved out of the agreement because they refused to participate. Several religious orders in California have also reached multi-million-dollar settlements in recent months, including the Carmelites, the Franciscans and the Jesuits.
However, more than 500 other lawsuits against the archdiocese remain unresolved despite years of legal wrangling.-AP/Reuters
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article