Iraqi arms dumps overrun by coalition forces in 2003 were still being looted by insurgents in search of explosives and ammunition as late as last October, according to a damning new report by the US Government Accountability Office (GAO).
Thousands of tons of military-grade high explosives as well as shells capable of being converted into the kind of roadside booby-traps which caused the majority of US casualties have been taken without hindrance, the report states.
The watchdog GAO also claims that a shortage of military manpower to guard Saddam-era weapons depots meant that insurgents were left free to strip more than 400 sites of lethal hardware for a guerrilla campaign which has killed more than 3000 American and 134 British soldiers.
Although allied troops have disposed of 417,000 tonnes of munitions in controlled explosions since the invasion, Pentagon officials admitted yesterday that they had no hard figures for how much was there to begin with. The GAO agrees the extent of Saddam's arsenal remained "an unknown quantity", but added it might range from thousands to millions of tonnes of conventional munitions.
The GAO report says that, despite these efforts, "unguarded sites will likely continue to support terrorist attacks throughout the region."
According to the GAO, a major factor in the failure to secure arms and ammunition was the assumption post-conflict resistance was unlikely" and that Saddam's army would capitulate and continue to provide security.
Instead, the White House ordered the 400,000-strong army disbanded and the Pentagon policy of committing as few US ground troops as possible backfired.
A Pentagon spokesman said: "We are doing our best to locate and destroy stockpiles, but given the size of the country and the other tasks coalition forces are undertaking, it's a huge task."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article