Experts are examining 1930s diaries that might be those of Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, but sceptics included a British historian who said he doubted they would be useful to history.
Senator Marcello Dell'Utri said expert examination was continuing.
"About their authenticity, I can't say anything but they have all the ring of being true," he said.
Mussolini granddaughter Alessandra Mussolini, a right-wing politician, said she had no doubts about their authenticity and predicted the journals would help to interpret her grandfather more objectively.
According to Dell'Utri, diaries spanning 1935-1939, to roughly the time the Second World War began, were held by the children of an Italian partisan who was among the resistance fighters who captured Mussolini in spring 1945.Dennis Mack Smith, a British historian who has written extensively about Italy, including a biography of Mussolini, said a farmer showed him the journals some 20 years ago. "I spent the whole night" looking at them and read the entries for 1937, Smith said. "They looked to me as genuine as I can imagine" but the writings contained "nothing seriously new that the world needed to know".
Smith said the farmer wanted a lot of money for them but he turned them down.
While it was "very plausible" the diaries were written by Mussolini, the entries had "nothing to do with politics, with his psychology", Smith said. "These things are not worth paying money for."
The entries were mainly about mundane events, Smith said, along the lines of "I went down to see my children".
Italian historians were either cautiously curious or downright sceptical. "So many of these Mussolini diaries have come out and almost all of them turned out to be false," said Giovanni Sabbatucci.-AP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article