The extension of Hunterston B's licence to generate nuclear power is more of an engineering matter than a political one. But it won't stay that way, and the boss of the company that owns the plant wants to meet Alex Salmond to make the case for a replacement.
It is for a UK-wide licensing authority to make the decision on whether it is safe to keep a reactor operating beyond its designated lifespan.
But it is for the Scottish Government to decide if Hunterston - or the other two licensed Scottish sites at Torness in East Lothian and Chapelcross near Dumfries - can be replaced with new plants. The law gives the Scottish Government the powers to grant or withhold permission under both planning law and a special measure under the Electricity Act.
Those backing nuclear say it is necessary to stop the lights going out, and that renewable generation cannot fill the gap. Its critics point out that Hunterston's technical difficulties have meant it has supplied only a small share of Scotland's electricity over recent years. With Chapelcross now closed, of more significance is Torness, which is due to operate until 2023.
The SNP has been a long-time opponent of nuclear power. And while it is not in favour of shutting existing plants, it represents an obstacle to the building of new ones. LibDems are similarly opposed, while Labour is split.
Conservatives in Scotland were keen to replace Chapelcross but that changed under David Cameron. The nuclear option has become a lower priority for the party, with more emphasis on a big push for renewable energy.
Bill Coley, chief executive of British Energy, said yesterday there is land for new plants at Hunterston and Torness but it would only build new facilities where there is support for doing so.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article